Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover > Technical threads > Controls threads

Controls threads Everything about controls in CoD

View Poll Results: Do you like to see Freetrack interface integrated in IL-2:CoD?
Yes, I like to have Freetrack interface integrated in IL-2:CoD. 133 81.60%
No, I don't like to have Freetrack interface integrated in IL-2:CoD. 30 18.40%
Voters: 163. You may not vote on this poll

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11  
Old 02-20-2011, 01:38 PM
LoBiSoMeM LoBiSoMeM is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 963
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wolf_Rider View Post
none of that explains "the what", LoBi...

and no, you're badgering anyone who opposes the hack tool, not advocating for inclusion... if you were "advocating" you should be able to and would have no hesitation to explain how it all works, to the layman. You would approach the developers with a clean product.

Now you may think you're being very clever , but you aren't doing your cause any favours... in fact you're doing it more damage than good.
And this guy said that another person was using sophistry...

"The what"... Man, talk clearly... You go around, and around, and aroud... You talk about "mouselook"... You talk about "hack tool"... You talk now about "4DoF"...

And the funniest about that is that you still doing this with some "tone" that you know a lot of things, how world works...

Talk clearly one time in life, please! How do YOU think Freetrack works in ArmAII? You believe the way it works is illegal or imoral? Answer!

Talking about "doing it more damage than good" means nothing here, you are just sound pathetic and without arguments. By the way, until now I like a lot your "insights about nothing"... And they are helping a lot to my "goal":

- People can see that all the lies about Freetrack are vapour, that BIS can use Freetrack Interface without problem, etc.

If 1C don't include FT suport in the new title, that's not my "goal", they have their minds and objectives. I wanto to clarify that's don't exists any reason to NOT INCLUDE FT suport, and that some people will like to have FT suport.

You can't prove nothing against that... Just keep talking nonsense.

Last edited by LoBiSoMeM; 02-20-2011 at 01:51 PM.
Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 01:09 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.