The so called "no-loss" concept (whole game) is wrong and stupid.

[Bhruic]

Originally Posted by tiberiu

Argumentum ad populum, at it's best

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argumentum_ad_populum

Actually, that's not true in this case. If he were arguing that his case is true simply because of numbers, you'd be correct. But his argument (which I'm not saying I agree with) is that because the numbers are on his side, it makes economic sense. Which, if the premise is true, would be a correct conclusion.