![]() |
#251
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Fw-189 flyable, why not? It would even have a minimal ground attack capability, with 4x 50kg bombs, and of course the two MGs. Quite able to devastate a lightly defended truck convoy, especially due to its slowness (= easier aim, just like the R-5, which is inredible fun to fly)
Anyway, Im still hoping for a flyable Ju-88C6a |
#252
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Would it be difficult to introduce a BoB era Spitfire with the aid of the allready present ones?
Or would it have to be scratch built? |
#253
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'm no 3D modeler so my opinion won't be worth much but I suspect it'd be a lot of work even if an existing version is used as a starting point. I'd suggest the Vc trop as at least some of the external elements (especially the length of the engine cowling) are transferable and one wouldn't have to deal with the poor mapping of the Vb if that was used. But regardless there'd have to be a whole raft of detail changes both externally and in the cockpit to make it a mid 1940 MkI.
Having said that, in my previous post on this thread I too suggested a MkI but as the August 1944 map will be first perhaps an F.XIVe would be a good idea, although as we already have plenty of era appropriate aircraft (and the MkIX would be the most numerous anyway) perhaps the XIV wouldn't be a priority. Last edited by HBPencil; 10-10-2016 at 09:59 PM. |
#254
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
I believe that the cockpits are identical between the Mk. I and Mk. V versions. The only 3d work needed would be to remove the cannon barrels which extend ahead of the wings. FM and DM work would need to be a bit more extensive. |
#255
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
External New spinner and prop blades (regardless if the Rotol or DeHavilland type is chosen), new exhausts, new oil cooler radiator, cannon barrels and bulges removed, mg's added and a new canopy. Cockpit New gunsight, radio controller, landing lamp controls, radiator flap control and of course a revised boost gauge. There're other details I could add but this gives an idea of what would need to be changed... and also I'd just end up looking like toooo much of a rivet-counter! ![]() |
#256
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ah, Spitfire I... Who needs that... Hurricane Mk.I, british, 1940 variant! That is what we need!
![]() |
#257
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I agree. I was mistaken. That's what I get for posting without looking carefully source materials first. There are lots more internal and external 3d changes than I first imagined.
Apparently, there are some mapping problems on the Mk. V skins as well, which make it difficult to make good skins. Arguably, the Mk V Spitfire could be used as a base model, but it wouldn't be nearly as simple as I thought. But, what might be simple to do is create an "A Wing" Mk. V Spitfire, as were used in 1941. That really would just require simple modifications to the wings. FWIW, Douglas Bader was flying a Spitfire Mk.Va when he was shot down. Were a Mk I Spitfire added to the game, the logical version to add would be the MK. Ia, brought up to June 1940 production standards (3 bladed constant speed prop, rearview mirror, 2-step rudder pedals). Other than that version of the Mk. I , the only other early Spitfire version which was built in significant numbers is the Mk. II, which was commonly used in early 1941. The Mk. IIa could use the "A wing" of the Mk. Ia, while the Mk. IIb could use the "B wing" from the Mk. Vb. But, both versions would need 3D changes to cockpit and fuselage. Last edited by Pursuivant; 10-11-2016 at 04:46 PM. |
#258
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Flyable Blenheims, Beauforts, Wellington and Swordfish are also both needed and wanted. |
#259
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
CAC CA-13 Boomerang would be a great addition to the stock game for the SE Asian theater of operations.
|
#260
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
![]() |
|
|