View Single Post
  #29  
Old 05-24-2012, 01:34 AM
NZtyphoon NZtyphoon is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: NZ
Posts: 543
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Crumpp View Post
It specifically says in engine limitations, Paragraph 3(ii):

"These figure provide a general guideline to the reasonable use of the engine. In combat and emergency other considerations may justify the pilot in disregarding these limitations"

You cannot look at a combat report that used an overboost condition as proof of 100 Octane fuel use.
Give it up Crumpp, all of your painfully nonsensical assumptions about 16 squadrons, based on pre war documents blah blah blah are a nonsense, as the Official War History Oil proves:









"The pre-war activity had been based on the assumption that United States supplies would be denied Britain in the event of war....there was no anxiety in these early months about the prospects of supply."

Protest all you like Crumpp, make all the unproven assertions you want - just give up and stop wasting everyone's time, including your own.
Reply With Quote