![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have qeustion about 4.12.
Patch 4.10.1 was compatibile with up.3.rc4. Now all servers many servers support 4.11.1 but not up.3.rc4 ![]() Will be 4.12 compatibile with up.3.rc4 ? Thank you very much for your answer. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
So basically the UP guys would have to recompile their mod packs on top of each new official release. I don't know much about what UP is doing but if UP3 RC4 was compatible with 4.10.1 that's where it ends. They would need new versions to be compatible with the new content in 4.11.1 and then with the new content in 4.12. It's not going to magically become compatible. They would have to release a new version...
__________________
Find my missions and much more at Mission4Today.com |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
The UP guys made a decision to go their own way as they thought they had a better idea.
Now they are left standing alone in the wilderness. You make your choice and run with it.
__________________
![]() Personally speaking, the P-40 could contend on an equal footing with all the types of Messerschmitts, almost to the end of 1943. ~Nikolay Gerasimovitch Golodnikov |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
If it was 3 or 4 years ago, I'd go with the new encryption idea, but nowadays, times have changed, I think. I don't know, what else is there regarding small mod groups (like those french I never heard of), but just taking the mainstream ones, I see, with UP slowly fading away, HSFX still keeping up very well on base of actual stock version, and then the stock game itself, kept alive by us. There is no more such big wars and flaming around and I feel, the situation is better than at any point in the last years, since modding started.
I don't see any reason (and the whole team doesn't as well) to do a new encryption. It would sepearate the community - nobody wants that - and after all, it would be broken soon anyway. Nothing worth the effort.
__________________
---------------------------------------------- For bugreports, help and support contact: daidalos.team@googlemail.com For modelers - The IL-2 standard modeling specifications: IL-Modeling Bible |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
OK, it is another point of view. I don't share it, but it is not so important, of course.
About french groups, as I know, there are active on 4.09 modding activities on several domains: new 3D projects, but also in reprogramming core class or dll. I am probably not wrong, but I think that the SFS packer used by UP has been done by one guy of these groups. |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
__________________
LEVEL BOMBING MANUAL v2.0 | Dedicated Bomber Squadron 'MUSTANG' - compilation of online air victories |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
BTW: 4.12 will support custom sounds, so that shouldn't be any problem anymore.
__________________
---------------------------------------------- For bugreports, help and support contact: daidalos.team@googlemail.com For modelers - The IL-2 standard modeling specifications: IL-Modeling Bible |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
You better assume that UP is dead. They are not posting anything, even if they are willing to keep it alive, they don't look to be doing anything on it, for a long time now.
Better switch to HSFX. |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Long time UP fan here but I think Zuti Mds made it to inflexible.
"Hey does this mod work?!" "No, incompatible with MDS" Very common exchange in the recent past. DBW won't be dependant on UP anymore, so for offline its the way to go. 1.8 is being worked on as we speak. Online HSFX, though its not my favorite.
__________________
|
![]() |
|
|