![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I see that a "built-in" anisotropic filtering is internal to IL-2, set by Video Tab of its Setup utility.
So I wonder: does this mean that adding a further AF by vidcard control panel is useless? Or does it sum its effects to IL-2 internal one? Thank you, GB |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It is suggested, that you use the internal AF only and set the AF in the driver panel to 'off' or 'managed by application'. This was said by Oleg back then, if I remember correctly.
I can - however -imagine, that additional driver AF is changing the effect in any way, but I don't know how. Much probably its just increasing framerate drop. This needs to be tested.
__________________
---------------------------------------------- For bugreports, help and support contact: daidalos.team@googlemail.com For modelers - The IL-2 standard modeling specifications: IL-Modeling Bible |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Thanks a lot for your fast reply.
Actually, if I set an "external" AF, I can measure an in-game fps drop, so that's sure, while I'm unsure about any visual improvement: edges and images in general look to me somewhat more "blurred", but "saw-toothing" of far edges is still there... ![]() Regards, GB |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
I hope this helps, Fafnir_6 |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
And with 'far edges' you don't mean the river edges perhaps? It very hard to get rid of them in fact, even if everything else is smooth.
__________________
---------------------------------------------- For bugreports, help and support contact: daidalos.team@googlemail.com For modelers - The IL-2 standard modeling specifications: IL-Modeling Bible |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Meanwhile, I tried to do the inverse of what previously suggested, removing IL-2 anisotropic filtering, setting "bilinear", since there's no "none" option. Of course, I removed related extensions as well. Surprisingly, I got an awesome increase both in framerate and image quality. I was allowed to following improvements: res. from 1152x864 to 1280x1024 AA from 4x to 16Q AF from 4x to 16x Forest from 1 to 3 only water=4 could hit framerate. Curiously, fps measurement in-game (shift+TAB - fps START SHOW) gives lower values while they actually are better (visual improvement is so evident that I can't believe to those numbers!). Also, some minor artifact I saw mainly on canopy frame in internal view disppeared. I think instruction for current IL-2 should be updated: old Oleg's dicta seem no more suited. Best regards, GB |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
GB |
![]() |
|
|