![]() |
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Hi all,
Just looking for a little bit of feedback here to help me make my decision. I've been working on making up a fictional RCAF squadron based on one of the assigned squadron numbers that was never used: 446. I've designed two versions of the badge for it, but I'm not sure which I like more: ![]() Uploaded with ImageShack.us or ![]() Uploaded with ImageShack.us The second one has a more originally designed 'badge'. But the first one looks pretty good too in a could be real sort of way. Charging horse emphasizing the never wavering charge, no balking. The tri-shields emphasizing the never breaking defense, the wall of protection. Opinions? Heckling?
__________________
Pilot #1 (9:40 hours flying time, 3/0/1 Fighters, 7/2/0 Bombers). RIP No.401 Squadron Forum ![]() ![]() ![]() Using ReconNZ's Pilot Log Book |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Both look very good.
Just one thing, if it's going to be published on the web and used as a squadron logo you might want to put a 'V' for virtual in there some where. Over here in Oz, the RAAF has had a stern talking to a few virtual squadrons that were using 'RAAF' in their squadron names and logo's. I guess the Canadian airforce would be similarly protective. Cheers and keep up the good work, it looks great. |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
__________________
Pilot #1 (9:40 hours flying time, 3/0/1 Fighters, 7/2/0 Bombers). RIP No.401 Squadron Forum ![]() ![]() ![]() Using ReconNZ's Pilot Log Book |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Nice work! I prefer the second one. The horse is a bit too blurry and out of place.
|
![]() |
|
|