Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover > Pilot's Lounge

Pilot's Lounge Members meetup

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-12-2011, 05:14 PM
Katana1000S Katana1000S is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 247
Thumbs down AMD Bulldozer is here, oops!

As many PC hardware enthusiasts know today is the launch of AMD Bulldozer with a rollout that has seemed to take forever, we were promised 8 cores (we got those) and up to a 50% performance increase over Sandy Bridge, sadly it does not come close, this is bad news for all of us, Intel can charge what they like now.

NDA is now lifted and it does not look good.

Anandtech:
http://www.anandtech.com/show/4955/t...x8150-tested/1

Guru3d:
http://www.guru3d.com/article/amd-fx...ssor-review/12

HardOCP:
http://www.hardocp.com/article/2011/...ormance_review

TechSpot:
http://www.techspot.com/review/452-a...dozer-fx-cpus/

VR-Zone:
http://vr-zone.com/articles/amd-fx-8...-/13694-1.html

Hardwarecanucks:
http://www.hardwarecanucks.com/forum...or-review.html

Vortez:
http://www.vortez.net/articles_pages..._review,1.html

Benchmark reviews:
http://benchmarkreviews.com/index.ph...=831&Itemid=63

Bit-tech:
http://www.bit-tech.net/hardware/cpu...-8150-review/1

Legit Reviews:
http://www.legitreviews.com/article/1741/1/

PureOC:
http://www.pureoverclock.com/article1376.html

Tomshardware:
http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/...90fx,3043.html
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-12-2011, 05:16 PM
Katana1000S Katana1000S is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 247
Default

and the review we were all waiting for, Hitler is not a happy bunny with AMD Bulldozer

Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-12-2011, 06:36 PM
335th_GRAthos 335th_GRAthos is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,240
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Katana1000S View Post
and the review we were all waiting for, Hitler is not a happy bunny with AMD Bulldozer

AWESOME! I could not stop laughing!!!!!


I prey that this guy will not make a new version of the COD video...


Pity, what Hitler said reminded me of the days my AMD 386DX40MHz was the fastest thing in the market (runing Falcon 4.0)

~S~
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-12-2011, 07:14 PM
Katana1000S Katana1000S is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 247
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 335th_GRAthos View Post
AWESOME! I could not stop laughing!!!!!

I cracked up when he said, all those who bought Sandy Bridge please get out
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-12-2011, 08:57 PM
mazex's Avatar
mazex mazex is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Sweden
Posts: 1,342
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 335th_GRAthos View Post

Pity, what Hitler said reminded me of the days my AMD 386DX40MHz was the fastest thing in the market (runing Falcon 4.0)

~S~
When Falcon 4.0 came out I remember having a Pentium II @ 400 Mhz so I guess you mean Falcon 3.0 I remember having a 386DX 33 back when 3.0 was released but upgraded to a 486DX 50 after it was released...

Ahh, chip nostalgia...

To not end up as a complete Intel FB I did run AMD:s from the 1.33 T-bird to the Athlon 64 3000. I was the Core 2 Duo that made walk the broad path again
__________________
i7 2600k @ 4.5 | GTX580 1.5GB (latest drivers) | P8Z77-V Pro MB | 8GB DDR3 1600 Mhz | SSD (OS) + Raptor 150 (Games) + 1TB WD (Extra) | X-Fi Fatality Pro (PCI) | Windows 7 x64 | TrackIR 4 | G940 Hotas
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-12-2011, 09:50 PM
Codex Codex is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Hoppers Crossing, Vic, Australia
Posts: 624
Default

I think that AMD have been too ambitious with Bulldozer, especially when there's not much in the way of software that is "truly" multi-threaded. I think the Bulldozer generation chips will go the way of the PhysX card … it’s a really good design in terms of thinking ahead, but there’s very little software out there to take full advantage it now and the current Intel line of CPUs can do more.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-12-2011, 10:10 PM
Katana1000S Katana1000S is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 247
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Codex View Post
I think that AMD have been too ambitious with Bulldozer, especially when there's not much in the way of software that is "truly" multi-threaded. I think the Bulldozer generation chips will go the way of the PhysX card … it’s a really good design in terms of thinking ahead, but there’s very little software out there to take full advantage it now and the current Intel line of CPUs can do more.
Quite possible, could be that AMD took a gamble with multi threading taking off, but it hasn't, (hence the firing of a CEO of theirs recently?) not even in our flight sim gaming world, right now 4 cores are more than enough and it will take years for software developers (especially Flight Sim) to catch up.

I still feel sort of sick inside for all those that put their faith in AMD's outrageous claims for Bulldozer, including the guy in this thread who had "waiting for Bulldozer 8150 in his sig" AMD has really let not just them down but all of us ... they were the only competition and now they have played their ace, we now know they have been bluffing for a long time.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10-12-2011, 09:58 PM
Katana1000S Katana1000S is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 247
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mazex View Post
When Falcon 4.0 came out I remember having a Pentium II @ 400 Mhz so I guess you mean Falcon 3.0 I remember having a 386DX 33 back when 3.0 was released but upgraded to a 486DX 50 after it was released...

Ahh, chip nostalgia...

To not end up as a complete Intel FB I did run AMD:s from the 1.33 T-bird to the Athlon 64 3000. I was the Core 2 Duo that made walk the broad path again
My first foray into flight sim was actually an Amiga 500 with half a meg of ram, it came with a basic Flight sim called Bob Dimmermans (I think) FA-18 Interceptor ... wow, all of a sudden I was defending the US and making carrier landings and shooting down Migs, I only wanted the Amiga to sort of do a data base for all my CD's an vinyl records.

This was unheard of.

After that I bought a PC from a guy in Aberdeen, Intel 33MHz with 2 MB (yes 2MB of ram) and a hard drive so small it would not hold a modern days OS swap file, but that got me into Falcon 3.0, Fleet Defender and lots of others.

Have been building my own ever since.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 10-12-2011, 10:25 PM
mazex's Avatar
mazex mazex is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Sweden
Posts: 1,342
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Katana1000S View Post
My first foray into flight sim was actually an Amiga 500 with half a meg of ram, it came with a basic Flight sim called Bob Dimmermans (I think) FA-18 Interceptor ... wow, all of a sudden I was defending the US and making carrier landings and shooting down Migs, I only wanted the Amiga to sort of do a data base for all my CD's an vinyl records.

This was unheard of.

After that I bought a PC from a guy in Aberdeen, Intel 33MHz with 2 MB (yes 2MB of ram) and a hard drive so small it would not hold a modern days OS swap file, but that got me into Falcon 3.0, Fleet Defender and lots of others.

Have been building my own ever since.
He he, we are getting old Started on the Spectrum myself with "Fighter Pilot". I have actually saved a little list of all my computers to not forget them. Home built since the P75

Year CPU Memory GPU
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1982 ZX Spectrum 48kb ???
1985 286-12 512kb ???
1989 386Dx-33 1Mb 1Mb SVGA
1992 486Dx-50 2Mb Trio64 LB
1994 Pentium 75 4Mb Matrox Millenium I
1995 Pentium 120 8Mb Matrox Millenium I
1996 Pentium 166MMX 16Mb Matrox Millenium I / 3dfx Voodoo
1999 Pentium 2 400Mhz 64Mb ATI Rage Pro / 2x Voodoo 2
2001 AMD Athlon Thunderbird 1.33Ghz 512Mb Geforce 3
2003 AMD Athlon XP 2000+ 1,6 Ghz 1Gb Radeon 9800 Pro
2004 AMD Athlon XP 3000+ 2,166 Ghz 2Gb ATI X800 Pro
2006 Intel Core 2 Duo E6700 2.66 Ghz 4Gb Geforce 8800 GTX
2008 Intel Core 2 Duo E8400 3.33 Ghz 6Gb Geforce 275GTX
2011 Intel Core i7 2600k 3,4 Ghz 8Gb Geforce 580GTX

Some day I will get back to AMD I hope - but not on the first gen Bulldozer at least
__________________
i7 2600k @ 4.5 | GTX580 1.5GB (latest drivers) | P8Z77-V Pro MB | 8GB DDR3 1600 Mhz | SSD (OS) + Raptor 150 (Games) + 1TB WD (Extra) | X-Fi Fatality Pro (PCI) | Windows 7 x64 | TrackIR 4 | G940 Hotas

Last edited by mazex; 10-12-2011 at 10:37 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 10-12-2011, 05:16 PM
baronWastelan baronWastelan is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: the future home of Starfleet Academy
Posts: 628
Default

Bulldozer? Bullsh1t.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:03 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.