Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover > Technical threads > Performance threads

Performance threads All discussions about CoD performnce

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-10-2011, 07:24 PM
Phil S Phil S is offline
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 1
Default Cliffs of XP

I am an early adapter of "Cliffs of Dover" having received a day of release copy from Amazon.com. A 1C/Ubisoft CD which to my surprise was STEAM dependant. New product releases that receive frequent, often Beta, upgrades are best kept outside STEAM whose policy is to implement upgrades that are only full engineering tested.

Waiting for that complete version upgrade was getting lost in Beta releases that seemed, at least according to members of SimHQ, to bring value to the simulator. So on 5 October when the newest patch and then its hotfix on 6 October, I decided to upgrade my STEAM installation.

My system is an Intel dual core 3.32Ghz, supported by 4Gb DRAM and Nvidia GTX285 (1Gb VRAM). These basics meet the recommended system requirements. However, I have a XP SP3 operating system. This also "meets" the system specifications, but I am beginning to wonder if it in truth does. I am beginning to find that "Cliffs of Dover" is moving toward System7 (x32/x64) in order to address new video demands such as Dx10/11 that XP is unable to handle. Eagle Dynamics followed this path in early 2011 by requiring a 3Gb Boot.ini launch statement for DCS A10 so as to meet this demand and not at the same time obsolete its 32bit installed base.

Now 10 October, I am on my third installation attempt of "Cliffs of Dover" and contemplating a fourth. I persist in getting screen stuttering and especially program lockups and crashes to desktop early in the program. These negative events do not happen with any custom mission or campaign. They occur early in 'official' Training or Single Missions as flights over Kent or worst over London. My settings are not extreme, "Very High". They are "High" without any Vsync or other post processing operations.

I have modified my Boot.ini as follows:

multi(0)disk(0)rdisk(0)partition(1)\WINDOWS="Micro soft Windows XP Professional" /noexecute=optin /fastdetect /3GB

This follows the Eagle Dynamics recommendation for emulating System7 (x32) in a XP environment. I have tried "multi(0)disk(0)rdisk(0)partition(2)\WINDOWS="Micr osoft Windows XP Professional 3GB" /3GB /fastdetect". However, this statement obliges a bootup selection that my USB keyboard will not permit. This leads to a standard 2GB XP setup. Messing with my Bios to amend this is not an option for me.

Along with this change to the Boot.ini, I also verified the integrity of my STEAM cache and deleted the contents of the "Shaders" folder before applying the two new beta patches to my STEAM.APPS main folder. The "Shaders" folder has subsequently repopulated.

In spite of this work, I still lockup or crash to desktop on the most basic single missions. The members of SimHq do not have an answer apart from rants or advice to change to System7. I thought best to go to the product source at the 1C Forums to obtain clear advice on my condition. I have no plans to upgrade my operating system from XP.

I look forward to your advice and guidance on this situation.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-10-2011, 08:06 PM
badfinger badfinger is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: League City, TX
Posts: 322
Default

Phil,

I, too, had XP prior to CoD coming out. I had my hard drive sectioned and Win7 64 bit added. The major reason for getting Win7 was it allowed me to add more RAM, which I think you will need. I don't think 4 is going to be enough.

As you can see from my specs, I also sprung for a better graphics card, also.

binky9
__________________
Win10 64 bit
1T Hard Drive
ASUS P67 motherboard
Intel i7 3.4ghz Processor
GTX 780 Graphics Card OC
24GB Ram
Track IR5
50" LG HDMI LED 1920x1080 60hrz
MS FFB2 Stick
CH Pedals
Saitek Throttle/Prop/Mixture and Trim wheel
Thrustmaster MFDs

League City, TX
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-10-2011, 08:26 PM
CWMV's Avatar
CWMV CWMV is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 758
Default

XP is obsolete and the 285 isn't doing you any favors either, a few of the guys from our VJG have 285's and have the same issues.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by banned View Post
Just fix the friggin thing you boof heads. It's getting boring now. Only 11 people on the whole thing. Yawn.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-10-2011, 08:58 PM
MadBlaster MadBlaster is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 666
Default

did you set the dx9 switch in your config.ini file?

[window]
Render=D3D9

The config.ini file is located in your My Documents\1C SoftClub\il-2 sturmovik cliffs of dover folder accessed through your desktop icon.

Btw, there is also a config.ini in your steam folder. Don't touch that. It is default parameters the game uses if you delete the one your My Documents folder.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-10-2011, 09:03 PM
arthursmedley arthursmedley is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: devon, uk
Posts: 326
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Phil S View Post
I have no plans to upgrade my operating system from XP.
Then you're stuffed I'm afraid. CoD needs DX10 which WinXP does not have. Although your graphics card is a bit marginal the rest of your system is adequate to run CoD. I have very similar specs except I run a GTX460 - and Win7 64bit.

I got CoD on it's launch day and I was running WinXP. I was getting exactly what you describe. Oh yeah, despite what some people might tell you, you can't hack DX10 into XP.
I took the plunge and switched to Win7 and have no regrets whatsoever.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-10-2011, 09:39 PM
MadBlaster MadBlaster is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 666
Default

XP was listed in the official system requirements before the game was released. Who is to say they won't optimize it for DX9 at some point down the road? We know today that the game is alpha/beta/unfinished. DX10 probably has priority now because they feel guilty for all the customers that already spent a bunch of money on new hardware and software, only to have their expectations shattered and lowered after a 6 year wait and $8 million dollars later. So, be smart. Don't invest a nickel in this game until it all goes official version. Then run it with whatever you have and make a decision if it is worth upgrading.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-11-2011, 04:54 PM
macro macro is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 217
Default

I too had xp, and really bad performance, i installed win 7 64bit and got a massive improvement. i also upgraded my graphics card to a gtx 560 after that and got another massiv increase now the games runs smooth, on a 2.8 gig dual core and 4gb ram.

win 7 is the way my man!

Last edited by macro; 10-11-2011 at 04:57 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10-11-2011, 05:01 PM
blackmme blackmme is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 42
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by macro View Post
I too had xp, and really bad performance, i installed win 7 64bit and got a massive improvement. i also upgraded my graphics card to a gtx 560 after that and got another massiv increase now the games runs smooth, on a 2.8 gig dual core and 4gb ram.

win 7 is the way my man!
Ditto for me. Huge increase in stability and reasonable increase in performance.

Regards Mike
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 10-11-2011, 07:32 PM
TonyD TonyD is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Jozi, SA
Posts: 263
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MadBlaster View Post
... Who is to say they won't optimize it for DX9 at some point down the road? ...
Can you really see that happening? If it is on their list it must be pretty far down it, and by the time that they get around to it the number of people still gaming on a decade-old OS will be so few, it won’t warrant the effort. I’ll wager we’ll see DX11 support before any improvement to DX9, but I may be wrong. IMO, the only reason to stick with XP is if you cannot afford to replace it, and I’d definitely recommend Win7 before any further hardware upgrades.
__________________
I'd rather be flying ...

Gigabyte 990FXA-UD5 | AMD FX-8350 | MSI HD7970 TFOC-BE | 8GB Corsair DDR-III 1866 | Win8.1 Pro 64-bit
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 10-11-2011, 08:03 PM
hc_wolf hc_wolf is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 439
Default

To anyone on XP. Save, Beg, Borrow or Steal (just not from me) But bite the bullet and buy Win7. I had xp and switched to Win7 and will never look back. It is awesome compared to xp.

ok i have High rig now. But before I spent a little cash my first upgrade was to Win7 with everything else standard.

Next il2 responds best to VRAM not just Ram. so the more Video Ram you have on your card the smoother the ride.

You really should be moving towards DX10/11 rig. Good CPU, medium grafics card and ram.
__________________
__________________
Win7, 64bit Ultra
Asus P8P67Pro MB
Intel i7-2600K
Coursair 16GB (4x 4GB), DDR3-1600MHz
Gainward Nvidia 580GTX 3GB DDR5
850-Watt Modular Power Supply
WIN7 and COD on Gskill SSD 240GB
40" Panasonic LCD
TrackIR5 +
Thrustmaster Warthog stick, throttle & pedals
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:17 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.