Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Birds of Prey

IL-2 Sturmovik: Birds of Prey Famous title comes to consoles.

View Poll Results: How should the flight models in BoS perform?
As in Birds of Prey, I'm used to them and like them. 3 8.57%
As historically accurate as possible, even if I have to change my flying. 20 57.14%
Give us both options in the game. 12 34.29%
Voters: 35. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-14-2011, 11:06 AM
MACADEMIC MACADEMIC is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 808
Default A question for all who love BoP and look forward to BoS

Hi all,

I've done some rather extensive flight model studies of Birds of Prey and of its sister product Wings of Prey recently.

The result in short was that the aircraft in BoP are all really overpowered in comparision to historical performance data, however have been artificially limited in their horizontal top speed performance (this has also been confirmed to me by the devs, although they said they had not done so intentionally). So, for example, a P-51 climbs and accelerates about twice as good as it should, however doesn't get anywhere near its historical top speed in horizontal flight.

In Wings of Prey, all flight models were initially underpowered, but have now been brought to historical specifications, meaning they are not as good in climb and acceleration, but have better top speeds in horizontal flight when compared to the Birds of Prey flight models.

This has a significant effect on gameplay. In BoP, the planes are really maneuverable and give you a lot of freedom moving through the dimensions. In WoP, you really have to be much more careful with your maneuvers and watch your speed and energy closely. Having altitude advantage plays a way bigger role here, it's very hard to beat an opponent who is above you.

So as it is at the moment, Wings of Prey gives you the more historically accurate flying experience but is quite a bit harder to fly, while Birds of Prey gives you more freedom of movement and (my personal opinion) more fun.

What would you like to see in the sequel Birds of Steel? Would you like the flight models to stay as they are in BoP, or become more authentic as they are in WoP? Or would you like to see an option for both?

Please vote and have your say here on the thread!

Thanks guys!

MAC

Last edited by MACADEMIC; 06-14-2011 at 03:07 PM. Reason: Typo correction
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-14-2011, 11:16 AM
olife olife is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: france
Posts: 972
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MACADEMIC View Post
Hi all,

I've done some rather extensive flight model studies of Birds of Prey and of its sister product Wings of Prey recently.

The result in short was that the aircraft in BoP are all really overpowered in comparision to historical performance data, however have been artificially limited in their horizontal top speed performance (this has also been confirmed to me by the devs, although they said they had not done so intentionally). So, for example, a P-51 climbs and accelerates about twice as good as it should, however doesn't get anywhere near its historical top speed in horizontal flight.

In Wings of Prey, all flight models were initially underpowered, but have now been brought to historical specifications, meaning they are not as good in climb and acceleration, but have better top speeds in horizontal flight when compared to the Birds of Prey flight models.

This has a significant effect on gameplay. In BoP, the planes are really maneuverable and give you a lot of freedom moving through the dimensions. In WoP, you really have to be much more careful with your maneuvers and watch your speed and energy closely. Having altitude advantage plays a way bigger role here, it's very hard to beat an opponent you is above you.

So as it is at the moment, Wings of Prey gives you the more historically accurate flying experience but is quite a bit harder to fly, while Birds of Prey gives you more freedom of movement and (my personal opinion) more fun.

What would you like to see in the sequel Birds of Steel? Would you like the flight models to stay as they are in BoP, or become more authentic as they are in WoP? Or would you like to see an option for both?

Please vote and have your say here on the thread!

Thanks guys!

MAC
hello teacher mac!

nice thread!

yes would like to be nice and more realistic to have planes more authentics.
i would add too a "real teambattle hardcore mode"
...like in real...one life,with the authentics technicals performances,possibility to land to load ammo ,more big distance between airfields and the battlefield to have the possibility to fly in formation and do tactics before enter in the battle...cockpit view only for this mode.

Last edited by olife; 06-14-2011 at 11:18 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-14-2011, 11:35 AM
winny winny is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Manchester UK
Posts: 1,508
Default

Authenticity is paramount. Otherwise why have different planes?

As real as they can, please.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-14-2011, 11:48 AM
Hicks-81 Hicks-81 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Madrid, Spain
Posts: 129
Default

I prefer as historically accurate as possible, but I think they have to offer both options. Must be given the opportunity to enjoy equally to those who do not control the flight simulator. Not everyone has such patience to learn to fly
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-14-2011, 11:51 AM
olife olife is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: france
Posts: 972
Default

when i say "one life mode",i think it would give to the game a touch of authentic action,personnaly ,even if birds of prey stay the best planes game of console,i find that ,in teambattle, the fact to have "many lifes" favour too much the "personnal counter of kills"instead of the battle tactics as for exemple fly in couple and cover his wingman,(i'm the first to fall in it...as a lot of us i think),one time we tried with mac and many others sim guys,the "one life mode",it was better ,cause everybody take care to fly without too much risks and try to help everybody cause too much guys of your team killed and u become alone against many others oppoments...it is the death and the deafeat for sure ,like in real.
of course the "real hardcore sim team battle" would be a 4th game mode with arcade ,realistic and sim...and not the only mode of the game.

Last edited by olife; 06-14-2011 at 11:55 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-14-2011, 12:34 PM
Gilly Gilly is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: 30,000ft+
Posts: 996
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by winny View Post
Authenticity is paramount. Otherwise why have different planes?

As real as they can, please.
+1 agree wholeheartedly
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 06-14-2011, 01:45 PM
Shadowcorp Shadowcorp is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: SOMEWHERE
Posts: 286
Default

Historical accuracy is what i want but i would still want the three game modes arcade, realistic and sim. arcade being the most the most unrealistic with rocket powered bi planes etc doesn't bother me, but realistic and sim should definately perform closer to the real thing
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 06-14-2011, 02:02 PM
Zatoichi_Sanjuro Zatoichi_Sanjuro is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 395
Default

Why exclude people who love flying/combat games but prefer arcade mode?

It's easy to implement and you don't lose more than half of your audience. I don't think I'm wrong in saying far more people play Arcade/Realistic mode in BoP than Sim mode. And what I like most about BoP is it's stepping stone nature in getting people interested in sim games.

More sales = more Gaijin games.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 06-14-2011, 02:17 PM
JRHOODY1 JRHOODY1 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: ULSTER
Posts: 85
Thumbs up

as real as they can get it please with sim, arcade, realistic, i think what you said olife about hardcore would be fun?
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 06-14-2011, 02:27 PM
olife olife is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: france
Posts: 972
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Zatoichi_Sanjuro View Post
Why exclude people who love flying/combat games but prefer arcade mode?

It's easy to implement and you don't lose more than half of your audience. I don't think I'm wrong in saying far more people play Arcade/Realistic mode in BoP than Sim mode. And what I like most about BoP is it's stepping stone nature in getting people interested in sim games.

More sales = more Gaijin games.
yes agree with u,i think that the 3 modes are good and have their own difficulties,just everybody play in mode he/they like.and i don't forget i start to play bop in arcade mode,follow in realistic and now in sim.i like play realistic too now,a lot of fun too even if sim stay my favorite mode.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:52 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.