Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover > Technical threads > Performance threads

Performance threads All discussions about CoD performnce

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-06-2011, 04:54 PM
Shadylurker Shadylurker is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 17
Default Massive FPS increase with Resolution decrese (?)

I was just curious why this is, I know in theory why, But is it known why this makes such a massive difference in this game?


EDIT: Whoa quick update i didnt enjoy playing windowed with 1024x768 so i changed the ini to almost full screen window, my fps full screen were 20 over water. with the only thing changed was window mode im over 100fps now in the same spot!

EDIT 2: Problem is fixed by forcing my GPU to max clocks. Game would not make my GPU move from it's idle clocks (300/300mhz) Now that my GPU runs at max clocks (925/1125) all the time the game runs great.

Last edited by Shadylurker; 04-22-2011 at 04:20 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-06-2011, 04:59 PM
Fuchs's Avatar
Fuchs Fuchs is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 26
Default

no multi thread support, overload for GPU, lot of possibilities...
__________________
Grâce à la sortie de CloDo, je me suis remis à ROF...
Seven 64 / Core i7 920 4.2Ghz Aircooled / Asus Rampage II Gene / GTX480 @860/ 4Go PC16000DDR3 / FFB2 / G940 / Tir 5 / etc, etc, etc...
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-06-2011, 05:27 PM
PE_Tigar PE_Tigar is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 114
Default

That does look suspicious - I remember when the only way to run Il-2 in Win 7 Beta was to run it in windowed mode (with the window equal to the screen res).
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-06-2011, 11:46 PM
Anvilfolk Anvilfolk is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 141
Default

Well, if you go from a resolution of 1920x1080 to 1600x900, you get 70% of the pixels you had originally. If you go down to 1280x720, you get only 44% of the pixels you had originally. The graphics card has to render all the pixels... if it has less than half of them, at least creating the image and sending it to the screen should be around twice as fast.

Of course there's all the computation that you need to do either way, but I think post processing effects are applied to every single pixel. Anti-aliasing and pixel shaders are some examples. The less pixels you have, the faster it goes.

Correct me if I'm wrong though.

I don't get why so many people complain. I don't think I've ever played a game with AA on, or pixel shaders on max. Or over 1280x720 for that matter. It's not that bad. People are complaining about not being able to have AAx8 or whatever it is, heh.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-06-2011, 11:57 PM
maclean525 maclean525 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 95
Default

Modern games run on my rig at 5760x1080 with graphics on high and 4x anti-aliasing, 8x anisotropic filtering around 60fps no problems. Cliffs of Dover should be no exception. FSX, A10, Wings of Prey, Rise of Flight all run at that res with ZERO problems.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-07-2011, 12:06 AM
FZG_Immel FZG_Immel is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 56
Default

I noticed this too....

I can triple my FPS from FLL screen 1920x1080 to windowed 1280x720...


I understand the gain, by less pixel, but it should not be that much..

in DCS A-10C you gain 15% max by doing such a thing...
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-07-2011, 01:42 AM
brp51d brp51d is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 17
Default

How do you set res for window?
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 04-07-2011, 03:41 AM
Cpt.Badger Cpt.Badger is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 24
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Anvilfolk View Post
I don't get why so many people complain. I don't think I've ever played a game with AA on, or pixel shaders on max. Or over 1280x720 for that matter. It's not that bad. People are complaining about not being able to have AAx8 or whatever it is, heh.


On the serious side: if you haven't really played a game with AA, I strongly suggest you do, as it makes A LOT of difference.

And people are not complaining about not being able to have AAx8. People are complaining about not getting a playable FPS on high end rigs. That is a big difference.
__________________
You are not your post count. You are not your rig specs. You are not your K/D ratio. You are not your sig.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 04-07-2011, 08:50 AM
FZG_Immel FZG_Immel is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 56
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by brp51d View Post
How do you set res for window?
just alt tab, and resize the window with your mouse !
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 04-07-2011, 09:15 AM
machoo
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I tried running COD at 1024x768. Looks and playes amazing. Too bad I need a microfying glass to see whats happening.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:27 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.