Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik

IL-2 Sturmovik The famous combat flight simulator.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-14-2010, 05:16 AM
julian265 julian265 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 195
Default DCS accepts any inputs for head pose, will SoW:BoB?

To avoid the need to run patches on DCS: A-10C etc, I use freetrack and PPJoy to send 6DoF head pose information to the sim, it was easy and works perfectly.

I'm really hoping the same competition and consumer-friendly method will be used in SoW:BoB, rather than the TIR only interface that we have in IL-2.

Any official comment yet?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-15-2010, 05:30 AM
albx albx is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Italy
Posts: 716
Default

I personally would like a direct support for freetrack without install something else like ppjoy or other software emulation. People can choose if buy TIR or DIY a head tracking.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-15-2010, 05:46 AM
Madfish Madfish is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 423
Default

It's not just because of the choice of TIR or DIY. There are a lot of tracking systems out there and many don't even work based on LED's (gyros for example).

So yeah, I'm all for support of any tracking technology, not just TrackIR/Freetrack. It should be a priority for any simulator to actually encourage immersiveness of the simulation - otherwise it's just a marketed/marketing toy.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-15-2010, 06:43 AM
Letum Letum is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 308
Default

Yes, head tracking input should be universal, just like joystick input.

Head pose input is the universal input and should be the one used.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-15-2010, 10:24 PM
julian265 julian265 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 195
Default

Bump! Any response from 1C?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-16-2010, 12:14 PM
LoBiSoMeM LoBiSoMeM is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 963
Default

Bump #2 and really like the proposition of Madfish and Letum.

Maybe SoW can be revolutionary also in the vast support of diverse 6DOF Head Tracking technology. Will be great!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:56 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.