Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik

IL-2 Sturmovik The famous combat flight simulator.

View Poll Results: Moderators in the weekly update threads.
Moderators should intervene more in the update threads 194 70.80%
Moderators should intervene less in the update threads 11 4.01%
The present work of moderators is just fine 69 25.18%
Voters: 274. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #71  
Old 11-22-2010, 08:47 PM
LukeFF's Avatar
LukeFF LukeFF is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Riverside, California, USA
Posts: 338
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fireflyerz View Post
Oh for gods sake man , give it a rest , your narrow minded , im gonna read you your rights attitude is getting real boaring, grow up.
Your spelling sucks, your grammar is horrible, and you're now on my Ignore list. Have a nice day.
  #72  
Old 11-22-2010, 08:59 PM
fireflyerz fireflyerz is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: All over the world...
Posts: 417
Default

Oh thank god...prat.
  #73  
Old 11-22-2010, 09:19 PM
swiss swiss is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Zürich, Swiss Confederation
Posts: 2,266
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Splitter View Post
I've seen both on various internet board and the ones that go downhill fastest are the ones where the mods take over.

Seen that too.

I one occasion it tore a already small community apart, resulting in three factions.

Maybe the people calling for a more severe moderation don't spend too much time on Internet boards.
  #74  
Old 11-23-2010, 02:00 AM
BP_Tailspin BP_Tailspin is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 170
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LukeFF View Post
Have you tried to wade through some of the crap people post week after week, in an effort to find meaningful discussion about the topic at hand? It's ridiculous.
One mans “crap” is another mans “meaningful discussion” …

Quote:
Originally Posted by LukeFF View Post
And no, it's not "free-speaking." It's a privately-run board. "Free speech" doesn't apply here.
I think this is for Oleg to decide.
  #75  
Old 11-23-2010, 05:43 AM
LukeFF's Avatar
LukeFF LukeFF is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Riverside, California, USA
Posts: 338
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BP_Tailspin View Post
One mans “crap” is another mans “meaningful discussion” …
I'm talking about the off-topic discussions, such as the current one about Britain's treatment of Poland. Nothing wrong with talking about that, of course, but it has no relevance to the topic at hand.

Quote:
I think this is for Oleg to decide.
He has to wade through all of that as well. Show the man some respect by staying on topic.
  #76  
Old 11-23-2010, 12:59 PM
leggit leggit is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 108
Default

well seems this thread has turned into a lot of chaff..i'm done with it.
  #77  
Old 11-23-2010, 02:28 PM
ATAG_Dutch ATAG_Dutch is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,793
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dutch_851 View Post
I agree completely Winny, even though I was one of the guilty parties.
I posted to calm things down before it turned into a slanging match, which seemed to work ok.
I retract that statement in full. I just went back and had another look and my post didn't calm things down at all.
That'll teach me.
  #78  
Old 11-23-2010, 04:06 PM
Triggaaar Triggaaar is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 535
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LukeFF View Post
I'm talking about the off-topic discussions, such as the current one about Britain's treatment of Poland. Nothing wrong with talking about that, of course, but it has no relevance to the topic at hand.
I'm one of the guilty parties of that discussion. Unfortunately my standards drop to that of the thread, I'd rather mods just removed all our off topic chat (in update threads), and we'd all get the message. Unfortunately I give in to the 'if you can't beat them, join them' attitude. If there's a conversation I'd like to join in on, it's tough to say 'hey everyone, come with me to chat about this elesewhere' (I did try it with one topic), and easy just to join in.
  #79  
Old 11-23-2010, 05:37 PM
Blackdog_kt Blackdog_kt is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,715
Default

That's exactly what i would favor as well. Bans should be reserved for offences like repeat personal attacks and so on, it's too harsh for off topic remarks.

Best thing to do would be to cut the off topic posts from the update thread and move them to a separate one, opened by a moderator. Since moderators can't waste their time categorizing each off-topic discussion in its own thread but would lump everything in the same basket, we would be left with a thread that's hard to follow for our side-tracked musings. This would gradually force us to open up separate threads of our own whenever we wanted to go on a tangent.

Sad but true, causing a minor inconvenience to upset the modus operandi is the most effective means to make people drift to a different one
  #80  
Old 11-23-2010, 05:52 PM
winny winny is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Manchester UK
Posts: 1,508
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dutch_851 View Post
I retract that statement in full. I just went back and had another look and my post didn't calm things down at all.
That'll teach me.
LOL.. I might join in.
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:26 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.