![]() |
#61
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
![]() |
#62
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
I like Oleg as much as the next guy, and also wish he hadn't left, but highly doubt the project would be much further along. Oleg would let the community know what the development was trying to achieve far more than Luthier, with the caveat that this is a WIP and features would be added when system resources allowed during the series. People still don't seem to understand that, proven by all the "you promised" posts. Luthier has learned its better to say very little. Yes the development sold the sim without mentioning its still a beta, but that doesn't change the fact that its still a "Beta".
__________________
Intel core I7 950 @ 3.8 Asus PT6 Motherboard 6 gigs OCZ DDR3 1600 Asus GTX580 Direct CU II 60gigSSD with only Windows7 64bit, Hotas Peripherals, and COD running on it 500gig HD Dual Boot Samsung 32"LG 120hz MSFF2 Joystick Cougar Throttle Saitek Pro Rudder pedals Voice Activation Controls Track IR 5 ProClip |
#63
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
#64
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Ding.. Ding.. And the ironic part of that is most of those who say "you promised" Are the same ones that wonder why Luthier does not post here more often! ![]()
__________________
Theres a reason for instrumenting a plane for test..
That being a pilots's 'perception' of what is going on can be very different from what is 'actually' going on. |
#65
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
"If you understood the beta process . . . . . " I really think that you have a reading comprehension issue . . . . or a communication problem wherin you are not able to prepare a sentence or comment without insulting the intelligence of the other posters. You assume so many things about others without facts. You just don't get it! The beta process is to eliminate problems. If problems are re-introduced, they are caught as a part of the process of evaluation of the changes made before giving it to the testers. You check your work!! It's not up to the testers to check the programmers work! The startup issue is not just a minimal issue. It is a game-breaker issue! Who the heck was asleep at the wheel on this one? If you are going to play around with the mixture settings, one would think that someone went through the process of checking to see if the aircraft would start or even fly and that the mixture settings really worked in action. I'm putting this one to bed. The issues speak for themselves. |
#66
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
They don't wonder, they know why. It's hard to regain trust and credibility once it's gone.
|
#67
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
is it possible they model flooding the carb? if hurry throttle now sets automatically to full rich when throttle is at zero position, but if you set it to like 50% throttle then it floods?
it's pretty funny. all these people buy new pc to beta test clod for 19 months. then when the patch finally gets done, their pc is obsolete and the hurry won't start. he, he. sorry, it's kinda funny at this point. ![]() ![]() |
#68
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hahaha, that is not an exaggeration too. What a f***** crying shame.
|
#69
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Obviously it is YOU who does not understand the lifecycle of a piece of software. |
#70
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
as was already stated over 9 months ago, work on CoD had/has essentially stopped, and their main focus was rebuild/create a new gfx and game engine while simultaneously working on BoM. if BoM is not released on schedule this time and proves to be a relative success, then the whole project and series is folded and they close their doors (have a guess at the amount of whining then, and the glee and joy from people like tree) the last beta patch, and largely this current RC, are primarily the beta introduction of the major progress milestones of the new gfx engine, with a few critical fixes for CoD added (like the CTD's etc). the "comprehensive fix of major CoD problems" has/is not included in this, there are some partially tested and some quick hurried CoD fixes included, but most of that hasnt gone through an orderly in-house testing process (which the gfx engine fixes have by all indications) my main concern is that the cluster of perpetually negative people here (not you specifically) and the disgruntled and frustrated newcomers swept up in that mindset, are so limited in only spewing out aggressive and rude "negative feedback" , that as a result it will collectively be responsible for missing the boat in getting the many badly needed fixes for CoD included in the final patch. what we should instead be focused on is to present the major bugs and missing features (AI not working etc..) in a way that makes it easier for luthier to deal with and setting priorities in their fixes (dont expect him to wade through long winded threads that are full of bickering and negative jibes, neither expect him to go looking at other websites to get "outside" input. its largely up to the russian and english CoD forum users to provide them with that information in a way that makes it easier for luthier, and at least for our forum it is obvious this does not exist (no idea what the russian forum is like)
__________________
President Dwight D. Eisenhower 1953: Every gun that is made, every warship launched, every rocket fired signifies, in the final sense, a theft from those who hunger and are not fed, those who are cold and are not clothed. This world in arms is not spending money alone, it is spending the sweat of its laborers, the genius of its scientists, the hopes of its children |
![]() |
|
|