ROF is out on may 7th

[KG26_Alpha]

Originally Posted by mazex

None at all, and it's sure interesting that they let discussions about their only competition continue undisturbed... Maybe because SoW is a couple of years from release?

Having said that - I'm looking forward a lot for the release of RoF, with or without online copy protection. With so few companies out there producing flight sims we can not afford to NOT buy the few games that trickle out nowadays...

Surely this should be locked and all further discussion put in "off topic" or simply banned.

So, "You wont f***k the most beautiful and sexy girl (up to date) just because she want your sausage at her place (not at your place)? Interesting...omg

[zapatista]

Originally Posted by virre89

If you fail to see the technological advancements that's being utilized in the product you're nothing but a failure to yourself.

lol you cant even think rationally

the low level aerial view and ground level views look pretty crappy, it is empty and bland. do we have to light a few joints and get in a special mood to see something revolutionary there ? its flat, empty, lifeless and boring with a few of the old dated il2 trees

Originally Posted by virre89

You're the one bashing the product before it's even released and making false accusations while trying to spread the word about "OH the almighy Neoqb is coming to fool us with a product worse than IL2 only to piss people off and let's wait for the SAINT Storm of War instead people".

what is a bit odd is that you keep being the one that turns up here and hypes this over rated crap here, maybe you got lost somewhere with all that complex clickedy-click you have to do in a browser to navigate the web, but you landed in an il2/BoB forum here

Originally Posted by virre89

And if RoF is a hyped product what isn't BoB then?
You claim me to be the fanboy while you're worshiping oleg confident of how it's already gonna be a 10x leap over RoF and all the others sims out there without even seeing a SINGLE game play video of it and rarly hearing any information at all.

your having another brain fart, got lost in where you are again ?

lemme help you out, yeps your again in an il2/BoB forum ! and guess what, thats where people get their updates on BoB and discuss it, not every other flying turd that grabs the short attention span of your limited brain power. want to discuss flying turds, go to the turd forum, you've even been warned by the moderators here before

and since you seem to know so little about il2/BoB, the 1946 addon cd already had ingame video from BoB, or did the pirated copy you downloaded not include the 2 cd ? ooops, catch you out there with your trousers down did we ?

Originally Posted by virre89

I've yet to see the fake 3d models you're on about however there is no secret that in a flight simulation you've to make sacrifices in favor for performance. Seriously you can't draw over 500.000 trees that are true 100% detailed 3d models and expect to run it on a high end machine today...

there you go again, blabbering on as if you know something profound about gaming without having a clue, and just making a string of excuses for what looks like a pretty crappy game. of course if you use 5000 of oleg's old tree types in RoF will you need a quad cray with liquid nitrogen cooling, but that the point now isnt it ? just go and refresh your mind at how stunning some of olegs new trees look compared to the old il2 ones, and hey guess what, you'll have heaps of them to running on a modern pc.

and btw, even the free new scenery maps for the il2 mods look heaps better than RoF imo, just have a little search for Canon's UK maps, and the new BoB maps being made for which screenshots have been posted on the main il2 forums in the last months.

Originally Posted by virre89

I am sure that if it was possible in terms of time, money and system requirements the ROF team would love to have Crysis graphics on the ground for all entities and units just as much as the Crysis team would love to have insane flight aerodynamics and a world gameplay map as large as the one in RoF, but you see they're two different games focusing entirely on their own agenda not world domination and perfection in every corner.

and there my little internet troll you have stepped right in the poop again

because if you look at oleg's work in progress, thats exactly what a next level new flightsim should take us, and by oleg reports of progress that is exactly what he is aiming for. the ground objects and planes look absolutely stunning in detail, so good in fact many of us are speculating it might incorporate a 1e person shooter environment at some point.

add to that online-offline play, dynamic campaigns, a reputable product from a designer with a good track record, well you get my drift, it's gonna be a hoot and no hype needed.

[virre89]

Originally Posted by zapatista

lol you cant even think rationally

the low level aerial view and ground level views look pretty crappy, it is empty and bland. do we have to light a few joints and get in a special mood to see something revolutionary there ? its flat, empty, lifeless and boring with a few of the old dated il2 trees




what is a bit odd is that you keep being the one that turns up here and hypes this over rated crap here, maybe you got lost somewhere with all that complex clickedy-click you have to do in a browser to navigate the web, but you landed in an il2/BoB forum here



your having another brain fart, got lost in where you are again ?

lemme help you out, yeps your again in an il2/BoB forum ! and guess what, thats where people get their updates on BoB and discuss it, not every other flying turd that grabs the short attention span of your limited brain power. want to discuss flying turds, go to the turd forum, you've even been warned by the moderators here before

and since you seem to know so little about il2/BoB, the 1946 addon cd already had ingame video from BoB, or did the pirated copy you downloaded not include the 2 cd ? ooops, catch you out there with your trousers down did we ?




there you go again, blabbering on as if you know something profound about gaming without having a clue, and just making a string of excuses for what looks like a pretty crappy game. of course if you use 5000 of oleg's old tree types in RoF will you need a quad cray with liquid nitrogen cooling, but that the point now isnt it ? just go and refresh your mind at how stunning some of olegs new trees look compared to the old il2 ones, and hey guess what, you'll have heaps of them to running on a modern pc.

and btw, even the free new scenery maps for the il2 mods look heaps better than RoF imo, just have a little search for Canon's UK maps, and the new BoB maps being made for which screenshots have been posted on the main il2 forums in the last months.




and there my little internet troll you have stepped right in the poop again

because if you look at oleg's work in progress, thats exactly what a next level new flightsim should take us, and by oleg reports of progress that is exactly what he is aiming for. the ground objects and planes look absolutely stunning in detail, so good in fact many of us are speculating it might incorporate a 1e person shooter environment at some point.

add to that online-offline play, dynamic campaigns, a reputable product from a designer with a good track record, well you get my drift, it's gonna be a hoot and no hype needed.

Well my friend you just proved to yourself and everyone around here that your an immature little kid just looking for a fight, pm me if you've some real answers to my posts above instead of pathetically trying to insult me in every single one of you're replies. It's entertaining to see you try tho , I'll guess i'll go make some popcorn as well

The board is IL2 it's not even about SoW , but hey whatever right, the topic is about RoF stick to it.
I don't know but maybe you think that everyone who stands by RoF or buys it will hate SoW or does hate SoW and IL2?
Been playing il2 for as long as i can remember and the same goes for looking forward to BoB, now i can't say that i am disappointed when another quality sim of the same level pops up and takes us back to ww1 aviation..

And for the record i do own the 1946 DVD
(2 and half year old video mate, and i can't say that it's looking stunning judging by that ) *caught fanboy*

Last but not least pm me your sources of a buggy / dead environment of RoF and include the Fake 3d models , I'd love to see them you know

[JG52Uther]

zzzzzZZZZZZZzzzzzz

[Feuerfalke]

Originally Posted by Tree_UK

Forget it Bobb, you cant educate Pork.

[RickRuski]

Originally Posted by Feuerfalke

Four month after a promissed.... what?

And who promised that to you?


@ RickRuski:
You can be banned for discussing that here, you know?

But then anyway big-time LOL - to be concerned about owner rights and companies limiting your own rights, while you suggest to play a game based on an illegal crack. Really got to ROFLOL!
Sounds like always: It's okay, if you brake a law as long as I'm not hurt by it.

There was no referance from me to anything other than "Canvas Knights", no reference to any web sites or links. get your facts right

[Abbeville-Boy]

can somebody tell me if ROF requires a connection to the internet at all times during game play, even if you want offline play? or do you only need internet to start the game, then you could disconnect and play offline mode?
i am worried about lag, thats why i like offline play, thk for answer.

[robtek]

afaik you have to connect to get your updates and stats and when you finish you have to be connected to get the stats to the server, inbetween the connection isn´t needed.

[C6_Krasno]

And there will be no lag, as there won't be any remote host.