|
|
#31
06-09-2012, 01:14 PM
|
||||
|
||||
That is probably beyond the capability of this decade old game engine.
__________________
 Personally speaking, the P-40 could contend on an equal footing with all the types of Messerschmitts, almost to the end of 1943. ~Nikolay Gerasimovitch Golodnikov 
|
|
#32
06-09-2012, 02:07 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
That's like trying to model the detrimental effects of harmonics on the airframe at certain RPM's. Some things are just beyond the capabilities, and arguably the philosophy, of this sim.
|
|
#33
06-10-2012, 01:01 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
In a way variable explosion/damage intensity is already modeled; Flak does more damage the closer it gets.
While it'd probably be a bit of a kludge(though as the engine was only designed to simulate the Ilyushin Il-2, I expect the game shipped with a few ghetto-mods already) I do believe it's possible. Personally I love limping home in a damaged aircraft to try and save it, so having it not blow its wings off on the way would be nice.
|
|
#34
06-11-2012, 01:43 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Well... on the limping back, was the initial sensitive point.
Why is it that a plane explode in flight, by just moving the throtlle, and getting an unrecoverable fire damage from less than a 10th litter fuel excess! Cutting that engine throttle, and entering into a dive should be enough to put the flames out, and a try to make a return to base. That era engines wont be able to recover in flight from a flame out, thing much more likely to happen on any jet.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
