Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik

IL-2 Sturmovik The famous combat flight simulator.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old 02-05-2010, 06:39 PM
GBrutus GBrutus is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 18
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ChrisDNT View Post
Nice modelling of the pilot, but his face does not look ethnically British.
They've yet to add the handlebar mustache. Perhaps he'll look more British then...
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 02-05-2010, 06:46 PM
Modding_Monkey Modding_Monkey is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 27
Default

Oleg.
I must say Wonderful job!

I do wonder. How will the Bridge work? Will it only be open\close or will it notice a ship coming close... traffic stops...open... ship passes... close... traffic starts?
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 02-05-2010, 06:49 PM
philip.ed's Avatar
philip.ed philip.ed is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,766
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AdMan View Post
I read this as sacrasm
Really? I read it as saying "if you’ll find anything wrong with our screenshots, please let us know." Clearly though, there may have been some sarcasm involved
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 02-05-2010, 06:53 PM
Asheshouse Asheshouse is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 271
Default

There should not be any railings between the pavement and the road. These have only been added recently. The pavements look too wide to me. This photo is from the period 1948-66



From memory, the road edge should line up with the inside of the archway. There is no pavement inside the arch, just around the outside.

But these are minor points. The overall appearance is great

Last edited by Asheshouse; 02-05-2010 at 07:11 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 02-05-2010, 07:02 PM
Modding_Monkey Modding_Monkey is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 27
Default

O and did anyone notice the German truck in the picture? Look likes is carrying AAA and something covered with Canvas.
Guess they did get to London.
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 02-05-2010, 07:21 PM
philip.ed's Avatar
philip.ed philip.ed is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,766
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Asheshouse View Post
There should not be any railings between the pavement and the road. These have only been added recently. The pavements look too wide to me. This photo is from the period 1948-66



From memory, the road edge should line up with the inside of the archway. There is no pavement inside the arch, just around the outside.

But these are minor points. The overall appearance is great

The man's right. Also, I think I read somewhere that the bridge was really dirty before it was cleaned post-war....can't remember where I heard that though.?
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 02-05-2010, 07:50 PM
Insuber Insuber is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Paris - France
Posts: 1,406
Default

At a first glance the submerged pillars of the tower bridge look false, as water depth doesn't affect their visibility. In other words they should fade out as depth increases, instead they look homogeneously visible.

Bye,
Ins
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 02-05-2010, 07:56 PM
Richie's Avatar
Richie Richie is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,450
Default

Too much work put into it in other words but for me it ain't a problem

Last edited by Richie; 02-05-2010 at 07:59 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 02-05-2010, 07:58 PM
Letum Letum is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 308
Default

The tower should be more dirty.
The London smog of the early 1900s took it's toll on the bridge before it was cleaned shortly after the war.
The soot covered stone work made the white paint at the top stand out much more than it does today.

The current texture doesn't show the high tide line either.
Below the tide line the bridge was much cleaner because it was not exposed to the smog as much.

Finlay, the round towers at the corners stick out a little too much.

The railings are, indeed modern and should not be there.

For Comparison:
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 02-05-2010, 08:08 PM
Zorin Zorin is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 573
Default

All taken between 1939 and 1946. So it needs to be a lot darker/dirtier. And the road needs to be changed as well as the insignia on the main strut needs to be removed.







Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:54 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.