Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik > Daidalos Team discussions

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #311  
Old 04-18-2012, 12:35 AM
tk471138 tk471138 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 285
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kittle View Post
There are enough of us here, perhaps a fund raiser is in order?
YEA forget that....my grandparents and great-grandparents PAID for those planes with their taxes and sacrifice (building the planes having to go on food rationing)....not to mention they also fought and died in those planes....

the american people at least OWN those planes....its cuz of the american people that those planes exist and were used to the extent they are...


the only thing worse than these policies by NG is the DT and 1c Company actually going along with such fraudulent claims and color of law....seriously stand up for yourselves dont tolerate such heavy handed determinations by some external, FOREIGN corporations (not to mention these corporations had only 1 thing on their mind between 1950-1990s and that was the destruction of the USSR (thats you people devs), why would you even care what these people think or the legal claims they make in fact they really didnt care who were being killed as long as people were dying and they were getting paid to make their war materials)...what a joke



ALSO

in regards to the ME410 the game ACES HIGH is adding the ME410, which gives one more reason why it should be added in game...
Reply With Quote
  #312  
Old 04-18-2012, 12:44 AM
tk471138 tk471138 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 285
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by martinistripes View Post
An idea for a future patch which may be very simple to implement. When selecting aircraft, for QMB or multiplayer, can we have small country flags by the aircraft so we know which country they come from and also maybe a small fighter or bomber icon depending on it's roll?

I know some will say I should know my aircraft better, blah de blah de blah... but I'm sure many of us don't have the time or inclination to memorise the (now) exhaustive list of options.

I play LAN with a friend. And typically our conversion goes like this:

Me: Ok, lets have russian vs german, 1943 aircraft only
friend: Ok
Me: Ok, I'll go in the Yak-3, choose an axis aircraft
friend: Which aircraft are axis? Is this axis?
Me: Don't know
friend: Is this one axis
Me: Not sure

You get the picture.

I know we could exit the server and go into the museum to check, but my idea of small flag & aircraft role icons next to the aircraft designation codes would be extremely helpful and a better way to do things.
one of the main reasons i started to play aviation simulations and ww2 aviation simulations in particular is my interest in ww2 in general and ww2 aviation....one of the BEST things to come from my experiences with games like this (mainly aces high and IL2, and a little WW2OL, among others) is the stuff that i have learned, both on my own and through the forums...

if you are having trouble figuring out what planes go to which country you should do some more research, trust me it will make a world of difference, and you will never stop learning new things trust me...

i know speaking for my self when i was new to this game i was overwhelmed by the amount of planes on the list, compared to many games IL2 has a HUGE plane list, every plane i didnt recognize or have not heard of i would look up and learn what i could about it....

basically just look these things up it will not only make you more efficient at these games but learning history and new things is always good...

Quote:
Originally Posted by martinistripes View Post
Hah! Really? Tell me why I should think twice before playing ANY game. I've owned Sturmovik since the original Forgotten Battles (2003), and been playing flight sims in one form or another since F/A-18 Interceptor (at least 1988 ). So please tell me why I need to think twice before playing 1942. Will I endanger somebody's life by not knowing the details of every single aircraft off by heart? Do you really take your games so seriously Pershing, that I have offended you with my lack of knowledge and ludicrous suggestion? If so, I really pity you. There's a saying that goes something like, "If you've got nothing worth saying, don't say it". Maybe you should consider that one before posting next time.

@Whacker Thanks for your response. Trouble is, I don't have the patience to study WWII aircraft. And with the choice available now, it really would be a case of studying. My friend has far less patience than I. For example, he would not sit and play a campaign or coop mission, to much straight flying and waiting around for him. We just like to duel and gloat (mostly after a few beers!) -a tradition since we were both teenagers. But I like to at least setup realistic encounters for us both.

To be honest, compared with other features and functions the developers have added, it seems a simple one to me. I appreciate the ambiguity that you mention, but surely you would just go with country of initial origin and purpose originally intended for (not what they were later adapted to do). If it's multi-role, you have a multi-role icon, or list a couple of icons side by side.

PS. I fly DCS: Black Shark 2. It's one aircraft and learning that is plenty for me.

ok just saw this so im adding it in via an edit.

First of all you wont have to STUDY anything...over time after enough research you will figure it out...american planes generally have one letter usually a P or a B in front of a number (usually 2 digit number)
british planes have names like spitfire and Halifax followed by their MARK (MK)number (MK14 or MK XVI)
german planes are named after the company who makes them...think of the HE111, or the BF109 ME262 FW190 JU 87 those are the main prefixes...


these are things that a normal person after doing some light research from time to time will generally learn or figure out the country a plane is from is generally one of the easier things to figure out using basic knowledge of ww2 aviation...

trust me man if you are playing ww2 aviation simulators chances are you have SOME inherent interest in the subject, surely you are curious about the topic otherwise you wouldnt be here...do your self a favor and look up somethings...because what you are asking for is to be spoon fed information, even with general knowledge (like on my first day playing these simulators), i could figure out what country a plane is from that was before i delved in to the subject of ww2 aviation...dont sell your self short you are capable of learning new things, please just try...

all you have to do is type in the plane name you are confused about and look at wikipedia, ive found it to generally be pretty accurate and if you are ever unsure of what is presented to you in wiki use the bottom to find the sources, or try and confirm what WIKI says on other credible sites...

Last edited by tk471138; 04-18-2012 at 01:01 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #313  
Old 04-18-2012, 02:36 AM
Kittle's Avatar
Kittle Kittle is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Bath, Maine. USA
Posts: 110
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tk471138 View Post
YEA forget that....my grandparents and great-grandparents PAID for those planes with their taxes and sacrifice (building the planes having to go on food rationing)....not to mention they also fought and died in those planes....

the american people at least OWN those planes....its cuz of the american people that those planes exist and were used to the extent they are...


the only thing worse than these policies by NG is the DT and 1c Company actually going along with such fraudulent claims and color of law....seriously stand up for yourselves dont tolerate such heavy handed determinations by some external, FOREIGN corporations (not to mention these corporations had only 1 thing on their mind between 1950-1990s and that was the destruction of the USSR (thats you people devs), why would you even care what these people think or the legal claims they make in fact they really didnt care who were being killed as long as people were dying and they were getting paid to make their war materials)...what a joke



ALSO

in regards to the ME410 the game ACES HIGH is adding the ME410, which gives one more reason why it should be added in game...
Of course, you're absolutely right about all of this. My grandfather served as well in the Navy, fortunately his ship class (Fletcher DD) made the original PF sim This fact of the matter is, we will never live to see these in game by fighting the man. Our kids might, as the cause is a just one, but we never will. Sometimes, bowing to the man is the only way to get things done quickly.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #314  
Old 04-19-2012, 12:40 PM
Reggie Mental Reggie Mental is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 26
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by redarrows2006 View Post
Can we have the Blackburn skua and the Blackburn rock in 4.12?
Why? Do you want to fly a deathtrap, that even unnopposed was a liability to its pilot and carried an offensive load that an enemy would call 'very slightly annoying, but harmless'

Probably two of the worst aircraft ever foisted upon the FAA

Can we have a Gloster Meteor?

A Westland Whirlwind With bombs and cannons?

How about a Westland Lysander and some covert moonlit SOE ops in occupied Europe?

Last edited by Reggie Mental; 04-19-2012 at 01:02 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #315  
Old 04-19-2012, 01:11 PM
Reggie Mental Reggie Mental is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 26
Default

....And, since it's IL2:1946, can we perhaps have a He162C and D with Hirth S01 engines and 30mm cannons so I can rip up B29s over Berlin? How about a fire extinguisher option like the D0335?

ooh, ooh...Some more Mistel Missions? Bridges at Remagen (Good mission for Arado 234, that) Normandy Beachheads, Mulberry Harbour, anti shipping (take out a battleship!)

...Arado 234 misions over UK, like Op Steinbock Raids in 1944 or low level/high level photo recce missions dodging fighters and flak.

Last edited by Reggie Mental; 04-19-2012 at 01:15 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #316  
Old 04-19-2012, 09:55 PM
redarrows2006 redarrows2006 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 23
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Reggie Mental View Post
Why? Do you want to fly a deathtrap, that even unnopposed was a liability to its pilot and carried an offensive load that an enemy would call 'very slightly annoying, but harmless'

Probably two of the worst aircraft ever foisted upon the FAA


Can we have a Gloster Meteor?

A Westland Whirlwind With bombs and cannons?

How about a Westland Lysander and some covert moonlit SOE ops in occupied Europe?
Sry my mistake. I have seem some interesst for the Skua aircraft but it seems like the blueprint do not exist for this AC and that the only thing is that they are trying to build one in Norway that they pulled out from a norwegian fjord. And the reason i like to have this AC in IL-2 is that is a plane who did an crusual role in the beginning of ww2 in north of norway. Also i planning to build an Norwegian mission from that timeperiod. We now have the map for that.

Last edited by redarrows2006; 04-19-2012 at 10:00 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #317  
Old 04-20-2012, 02:33 PM
SPITACE SPITACE is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: england
Posts: 95
Default

can team daidalos tell us what they are working on instead of us asking when the 4.12 update is out. i am sure they are working on the P36 and p40 cockpits and the rear cockpit of the beaufighter hope i am right.
Reply With Quote
  #318  
Old 04-20-2012, 10:20 PM
fruitbat's Avatar
fruitbat fruitbat is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: S E England
Posts: 1,065
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SPITACE View Post
can team daidalos tell us what they are working on instead of us asking when the 4.12 update is out. i am sure they are working on the P36 and p40 cockpits and the rear cockpit of the beaufighter hope i am right.
I can tell you with absolute certainty that they are working on a 4.11 bugfix patch, ie 4.11.1
Reply With Quote
  #319  
Old 04-21-2012, 01:00 AM
redarrows2006 redarrows2006 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 23
Default Rong again

Is there a posebillety to make the Blackburn Skua?
I found these printing and there also is an whole cockpit of the Skua. Therefor there is printing of the Skua
Attached Images
File Type: jpg SkuaPlan.jpg (41.5 KB, 31 views)
File Type: jpg Skua%20snitt.jpg (195.9 KB, 29 views)
Reply With Quote
  #320  
Old 04-22-2012, 04:15 AM
Anton88 Anton88 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 16
Lightbulb *** Please fix bombrack on the IAR-81C for update v4.12 !!! ***

Please remove "bomb rack" on the IAR-81 heavy fighter, as it never carried this in combat anyways.

Please fix 'radiator' under the nose of the IAR-81C aircraft



Quote:

PS: IAR aircraft had fire extinguishers on board - (the white intrument that says 'Extinctor Automat') - please simulate this in game
PS: Please add IAR-80A fighter (6 machine guns & reflector gunsight) to game. - This was the most mass produced IAR-80/81 of them all, and is not in game - surprisingly.

Last edited by Anton88; 04-22-2012 at 04:20 AM.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:15 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.