|
IL-2 Sturmovik The famous combat flight simulator. |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
The alloys in the Aluminum were extremely flammable and some planes went down simply from the fires themselves spreading so fast. OLEG-- One question that I believe you haven't been asked yet, and I do not believe you will answer... - Lets say I am playing SOW and I fly my plane straight into the ground and crash- will the physics of the crash and explosion be a similar damage model as IL2- or is it better/different? Thanks and I hope the new office is going well! -Omphalos |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#23
|
|||
|
|||
They used magnesium alloys in the cockpit?
|
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Well wouldn't ya know, This Oleg fella actually knows what's going on. Who'd a thunk it?
|
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
I think Oleg was thinking of the He-70: He-70 Wiki Quote:
I have seen plenty of pictures of burned remains of aircraft, but the wing tips and tails do not suffer burn damage. Only where fuel, oil, and other combustible material exist is the aluminum melted. Standard aircraft design, even at that time, was to eliminate any combustible structure and skin in the engine area. Common safety practice. Last edited by Flying Pencil; 10-14-2010 at 02:25 PM. |
#26
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
To reach that goal they used magnesium in the engine housing. The result were that a engine fire usually burned through the main spar of the wing, with predictable results.
__________________
Win 7/64 Ult.; Phenom II X6 1100T; ASUS Crosshair IV; 16 GB DDR3/1600 Corsair; ASUS EAH6950/2GB; Logitech G940 & the usual suspects |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
S!
Japanese used the T-7178 aluminum that was light, but burned easier than normal aircraft aluminum. No source indicates Bf109 being any more suspectible to fire than any other plane of that era. |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
Using pure Mg is nuts.
But even MgAl alloys burn well, just takes a little more to ignite them. |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#30
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Nooooooo... |
|
|