Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Birds of Prey

IL-2 Sturmovik: Birds of Prey Famous title comes to consoles.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 01-22-2010, 04:38 PM
TRC Subaru TRC Subaru is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: NOR-CAL
Posts: 143
Thumbs up Correct

Quote:
Originally Posted by Zatoichi_Sanjuro View Post
A real pilot, in the Second World War, doesn't look out his cockpit and automatically lock-on to enemy planes no matter if they're in clouds or anywhere else.

There is a big difference between some kind of Track IR system and the target camera in Realistic.
Yes, that is a good point, to be absolutely correct the tracking should shut-off and not be able to “lock-on” again until you visually see him once he breaks out of the clouds, agreed.

Also – the little “Red Diamond” that pops up around the target should not be allowed to make it more “real” and difficult to target, especially against various backgrounds.

Last edited by TRC Subaru; 01-22-2010 at 05:21 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 01-22-2010, 05:38 PM
STINGERSIX78 STINGERSIX78 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Hamburg
Posts: 389
Default

host options:

hud on/off
only cockpitview on/off
target cam on/off
etc...
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 01-22-2010, 08:50 PM
winny winny is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Manchester UK
Posts: 1,508
Default

If it were up to me the target lock would only work on anything that would be visable through the canopy, if it moved outside of this then you'd have to free look around and it'd re-lock after 3-5 seconds of you finding the target. (so you could still lose someone).This would be a lot more realistc and you'd also then be able to use blind spots to your advantage.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 01-23-2010, 09:01 AM
Ghillied raptor Ghillied raptor is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 37
Default

I may get a lot of hate for this but I think the current system is better than the 'lock on' idea.I can't tell you how many times I got a kill by sneaking up on an enemy.With the aformentioned system turn and burn peeps would dominate.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 01-23-2010, 09:16 AM
STINGERSIX78 STINGERSIX78 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Hamburg
Posts: 389
Default

nah...

the map suxx. some games, u spending more time to chase the red-dots on the map, than in cockpit.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 01-23-2010, 03:01 PM
TRC Subaru TRC Subaru is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: NOR-CAL
Posts: 143
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ghillied raptor View Post
I may get a lot of hate for this but I think the current system is better than the 'lock on' idea.I can't tell you how many times I got a kill by sneaking up on an enemy.With the aformentioned system turn and burn peeps would dominate.
You would still "sneak up" on people, it is not untill after you find someone can you lock on...maybe it could be set that you have to be on the enemy by at least 1000ft before you are allowed to lock.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 01-23-2010, 03:04 PM
TRC Subaru TRC Subaru is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: NOR-CAL
Posts: 143
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by winny View Post
If it were up to me the target lock would only work on anything that would be visable through the canopy, if it moved outside of this then you'd have to free look around and it'd re-lock after 3-5 seconds of you finding the target. (so you could still lose someone).This would be a lot more realistc and you'd also then be able to use blind spots to your advantage.
Sounds like a perfect option for SIM mode!
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 01-23-2010, 03:26 PM
Riceball Riceball is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Iowa City, IA. USA
Posts: 306
Default

Sounds like we need the planes fixed so fools are not hugging the deck. Like a bunch of Pee-Wee's
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 01-23-2010, 03:34 PM
Houndstone Hawk Houndstone Hawk is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Sat in front the PC
Posts: 272
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Riceball View Post
Sounds like we need the planes fixed so fools are not hugging the deck. Like a bunch of Pee-Wee's
'Fools'?, 'Pee-Wees'? Just for switching on their consoles & wanting a bit of fun with a game & not flying to your designated specifics? Man u gotta lighten up some.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 01-23-2010, 03:40 PM
Riceball Riceball is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Iowa City, IA. USA
Posts: 306
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Houndstone Hawk View Post
'Fools'?, 'Pee-Wees'? Just for switching on their consoles & wanting a bit of fun with a game & not flying to your designated specifics? Man u gotta lighten up some.
Yeah. We all know that WW2 pilots did nothing but fly at treetop level.

Edit: Not really. So you are'nt mistaken.

Last edited by Riceball; 01-23-2010 at 03:43 PM.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 01:38 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.