Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Birds of Prey

IL-2 Sturmovik: Birds of Prey Famous title comes to consoles.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #161  
Old 12-18-2009, 01:37 PM
phlux phlux is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 108
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Raw Kryptonite View Post
Good games guys!
Heard the term "flaming fire" on Conan tonight. You know how bad that stuff is. See, I'm not crazy.
Yessir good games to you, and yeah that "flaming" fire is hottest and worst kind

We'll have to do that again soon.
Reply With Quote
  #162  
Old 12-18-2009, 03:53 PM
Vulcan607 Vulcan607 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Angels 6
Posts: 470
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Araqiel View Post
Yeah, plus a Vulcan, a Nimrod and thirteen Victors, and a 4,000-mile map to fly them on, right?
no what ever gave you that idea
was 2 vulcans
Reply With Quote
  #163  
Old 12-18-2009, 03:58 PM
Vulcan607 Vulcan607 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Angels 6
Posts: 470
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FOZ_1983 View Post
Air to air refueling could work on the maps we already have. If i play arena mode online then its impossible to fly from your base to the enemies base and back in an F14 without drop tanks and your afterburners on all the way. Without burners then its fine. Going for the realism which i love and respect. Its upto me to manage my fuel consumption accordingly and check everything is ok. If i have drop tanks and i need to be more manouvrable - jetison them, no matter how much fuel is in them.
i just think that if you need fuel but not ammo it would be good to have a TAT circling so that you have the option to stay airbourne, also would need skill so as not to break probe/drouge. Tactial it would mean you dont have to land and take off again to react if your low on fuel.

P.S. cheers for that game.
Reply With Quote
  #164  
Old 12-18-2009, 04:25 PM
Raw Kryptonite Raw Kryptonite is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 450
Default

If we could have had a 2nd map, it might have been fun to have "neutral" airborne refueling like the current map has the central base. You could shoot it down, but you'd be shooting yourself in the foot also to do without it.

Some canyons and land features to hide movement would be nice, like that map with the trains you take out.
Reply With Quote
  #165  
Old 12-18-2009, 05:14 PM
Vulcan607 Vulcan607 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Angels 6
Posts: 470
Default

how about one of the tripple nipple tankers.
love to see formation refueling.
Reply With Quote
  #166  
Old 12-18-2009, 05:40 PM
The M00ps The M00ps is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 60
Default

*heh-heh heh-heh, he said "triple nipple"

Yes, lotsa fun last night. It was nice to dust the ol' Tomcat off again. She still handles like always, ie. a school bus.

I could make this a regular occurrance, at least until Julember rolls around.
Reply With Quote
  #167  
Old 12-18-2009, 06:05 PM
FOZ_1983 FOZ_1983 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Blackpool, England
Posts: 1,997
Default

If anyone is online tonight, i'll play some over-g.

played a couple of games of arena earlier with vulcan, was fun.
Reply With Quote
  #168  
Old 12-18-2009, 06:08 PM
Araqiel Araqiel is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 93
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vulcan607 View Post
no what ever gave you that idea
was 2 vulcans
Well, sure, but if we're counting airborne reserves/ ones forced to turn back then there were two Nimrods as well; I'm just including those that actually flew their intended flight plans.
Reply With Quote
  #169  
Old 12-18-2009, 06:24 PM
Vulcan607 Vulcan607 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Angels 6
Posts: 470
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Araqiel View Post
Well, sure, but if we're counting airborne reserves/ ones forced to turn back then there were two Nimrods as well; I'm just including those that actually flew their intended flight plans.
ok
Reply With Quote
  #170  
Old 12-31-2009, 01:19 AM
Buggins Buggins is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 208
Default

Taito have hinted to me in an email that a sequel may be in the works. Also, it has been reported that a magazine listed "World Air Force'' by Taito as an upcoming 360 game for 2010. Fingers crossed..
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:34 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.