![]() |
#1471
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Really? |
#1472
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
LOL, the 'song and dance routine' is changed, again. Anything to not admit being wrong.
|
#1473
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
None of the combat reports I can find use this term.The term is only used by the author of the spitfireperformace.com page.
|
#1474
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
![]()
__________________
Theres a reason for instrumenting a plane for test..
That being a pilots's 'perception' of what is going on can be very different from what is 'actually' going on. |
#1475
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
People trying to disparage someone, are doing it to themself in reality!
__________________
Win 7/64 Ult.; Phenom II X6 1100T; ASUS Crosshair IV; 16 GB DDR3/1600 Corsair; ASUS EAH6950/2GB; Logitech G940 & the usual suspects ![]() |
#1476
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
By July it shows ~8 Squadrons and I imagine some of those squadrons are operating Spitfire Mk II's. August adds another 5 Squadrons and by sometime in September, a full 16 squadrons online as researched by Morgan and Shacklady. According to the RAF estabilishment by September there were 33 squadrons of Hurricanes and 19 Squadrons of Spitfires. |
#1477
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Dutton 145 Sqn 1July40.pdf There were several other colloquial expressions used to describe using +12 lbs boost, all with the same meaning, regardless of what Crumpp might think. And wouldn't ya know it, these squadrons are not on pstyle's list... Last edited by NZtyphoon; 05-02-2012 at 01:36 AM. |
#1478
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
17, 56, 73, 79, 87, 85, 151, 229, 245 Sqns May, 145 Sqn, July, 1 Sqn. August, 43 Sqn June That makes 18 squadrons Feb-July another 6 in August...oops! that equals 24 in August plus another eight September = 32 squadrons. Why that's exactly twice as many squadrons than Morgan and Shacklady tssk tssk tssk. ![]() Breakdown = 15 Spitfire, 17 Hurricane Last edited by NZtyphoon; 05-02-2012 at 01:44 AM. |
#1479
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
There are also records for useage of boost cut out or 12 lbs for the following squadrons, as can be found here:
111, 151 - Feb 1940 1, 3, 17, 56, 73, 79, 85, 87, 229, 245 - May 1940 43 - June 1940 145 - July 1940 249, 303 - September 1940 |
#1480
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Even if Crump is wrong at all some here is has no more than "ad hominem" behaviour. Some of them act in similar ways in another threads, trying to negate the fact presented, creating arguments, digging others, misleading some and given their own deturpated interpretation even when the data were against their favourite a/c.
All this turned on a childish fight where wins who gives the last word even if wrong word in an vicious looping. All us have some bias however we have to try clear our minds. My suggestion is that you put your arguments and give a time. Everyone put the arguments over the table and let the readers decide. Stop trying to counter any time. Please, this is for all. You claim being scientific and rational, but nothing here is in this way at all. Last edited by Ernst; 05-02-2012 at 02:42 AM. |
![]() |
|
|