|
IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games. |
View Poll Results: Battle of France as add on? | |||
Yes, will buy this. | 55 | 58.51% | |
OK, if for free. | 21 | 22.34% | |
No, looking forward to Eastern front. | 18 | 19.15% | |
Voters: 94. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1421
|
||||
|
||||
+1
__________________
|
#1422
|
|||
|
|||
For a none existing game i've many fun with it
|
#1423
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
+1 to that other guy there. Last edited by JG52Uther; 09-08-2012 at 08:00 PM. |
#1424
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Well I am not sorry that I can have fun in the game, nor am I sorry that I am not such a pessimistic turd like you...
__________________
Gigabyte X58A-UD5 | Intel i7 930 | Corsair H70 | ATI 5970 | 6GB Kingston DDR3 | Intel 160GB G2 | Win 7 Ultimate 64 Bit |
MONITOR: Acer S243HL. CASE: Thermaltake LEVEL 10. INPUTS: KG13 Warthog, Saitek Pedals, Track IR 4. Last edited by JG52Uther; 09-08-2012 at 07:59 PM. |
#1425
|
|||
|
|||
Anders bare fortsæt, alle behøver ikke at være präktig !
Mj |
#1426
|
|||
|
|||
When will you realise it is nothign to do with running the game, or CTDs (though these do affect many people)...it is what you have got *when* *it* *is* *running*.
It is not much a BoB game is it, really? And all thos emissing features - where did they go? No amount of horse-power or low-level IO monitoring or Regedit or hex editing is going to change the fact that the core runtimes and graphics kernel (never mind associated caching, paging, DLL and general library calls) seem less than efficient, or coded to a particularly modern standard (even allowing for hardware abstraction layers etc). To say nothign of who coded them, and who is now coding/revising them. *Then* add-in the fact you might well have a situation where new coders are being asked to unravel legacy code, while supplying new libraries and calls. What you have there, my son, is quite possibly an unholy mess. Stop fixating on your ability to run it and consider the wider question: is it well done to a decent standard? And is there a game there? Is there much BoB? And what do the patches and B6's prouncements taken together tell you? Perhaps a fair few people are having the time of their life with this game. Good for them. But this isn;t about them. It's about the game as a whole, much of which is still missing, and all the indications are it will stay missing. Once you acknowledge that simple reality, it actually makes you less tenacious and/or bitter and able to move on and look at things clearly. Fogging up with obstinacy seems a waste of time to me. Each to their own. |
#1427
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Last edited by JG52Uther; 09-08-2012 at 07:59 PM. |
#1428
|
|||
|
|||
Bra, så kan du dra åt helvete!!
Last edited by Anders_And; 09-08-2012 at 07:52 PM. |
#1429
|
|||
|
|||
+1
|
#1430
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
On the bright side, maybe now he can relate to what guys like me have had to deal with over the past year with guys like you? For example No where did Krupi say the game is without fault.. That is just the game guys like you try to play with anyone who has anything postive to say about the game.. You and yours are so transparent
__________________
Theres a reason for instrumenting a plane for test..
That being a pilots's 'perception' of what is going on can be very different from what is 'actually' going on. |
|
|