![]() |
|
IL-2 Sturmovik The famous combat flight simulator. |
View Poll Results: Would you sacrifice small graphical issues in order to be able to use 6-DoF | |||
Yes I could cope with this as it would add to my flying experience |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
270 | 85.44% |
No, I'd rather have my head on a fixed stick thanks you very much |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
46 | 14.56% |
Voters: 316. You may not vote on this poll |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#131
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
reading comprehension levels round here are appalling. |
#132
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
This is the problem if you don't know what its like to be strapped in a cockpit, voting here for DT to put 6DoF into IL2 1946 thinking its a normal viewing system when its not, there needs to be a better system just not 6DoF as it is at present. I know what its like to be thrown around in an aircraft pulling G's and I put the vids up to show that head movements possible but not the way 6DoF lets you look around at present. I'm not trying to convince anyone of anything, I cant if they already have made their mind up, all I'm trying to get across is the ridiculous way some think 6DoF should be compared to how it really is. Other forum members have posting in this thread from their real life experiences also, and these seem to have been ignored as those that want 6DoF simply go blind to those that really know. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Simply bunging in 6DoF is wrong ![]() . Last edited by KG26_Alpha; 02-23-2011 at 06:45 PM. |
#133
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
What is wrong here is that you guys focus way too much on how a pilot is strapped in his seat instead of looking at actual pilot head movements.
|
#134
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
![]() |
#135
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Might be, but not as wrong as a head on a stick!
![]() ![]() ![]()
__________________
Win 7/64 Ult.; Phenom II X6 1100T; ASUS Crosshair IV; 16 GB DDR3/1600 Corsair; ASUS EAH6950/2GB; Logitech G940 & the usual suspects ![]() |
#136
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
![]() |
#137
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The simple fact that a lot of planes have insturments that are obscured by the flight stick is enough to indicate that real pilots had at least some lateral movement. I don't understand the reluctance to accept that fact.
Try flying a plane without the speedbar when both compasses and the turn/slip indicator are obscured by a flightstick. |
#138
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
If you want realism, listen to me. If you want arcade... well, then... My original caveat is clear and still accurate. To INVOKE 6DOF in a *realistic manner* would not make any of you happy. Even I agree the current restriction is just as inaccurate, however, to enable 6DOF like you see in the mods is grossly MORE inaccurate. You'd need to move about 27-33% to 6DOF. But that would be about it. Last edited by Tolwyn; 02-23-2011 at 08:44 PM. |
#139
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
![]()
__________________
---------------------------------------------- For bugreports, help and support contact: daidalos.team@googlemail.com For modelers - The IL-2 standard modeling specifications: IL-Modeling Bible |
#140
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Flying a combat aircraft from my desk looking through a 24" diagonal box is not realistic either.. I am not saying that 6DoF should be implemented exactly as it is in the mod packs.... I never said that but it should be implemented.. and it wouldn't be too much work if it were tightened up some .. the work has already been done.. changing a few numbers in the code is not too hard for these guys.. Considering how many people use TIR3 and above in this sim and the fact that it is possible.. to not do it IMO is a mistake. and of course my opinion is far from the only one allowed here.. but it is shared by many.. Quote:
Last edited by Bearcat; 02-24-2011 at 02:30 AM. |
![]() |
|
|