Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik

IL-2 Sturmovik The famous combat flight simulator.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #91  
Old 01-01-2009, 10:15 PM
SaQSoN SaQSoN is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Nowhereland
Posts: 340
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LEXX View Post
so hold back the gamer insults and share your knowledge.
I do not insult gamers, unless, or more, then they try to insult me. If you think otherwise, point me where I did it, please.

As for sharing my knowledge about the game mechanics and such - I am not able to do so for an obvious reason.

And regarding the official mods support. Though, it was said many times before, I'll repeat it once again:

It is NOT possible to make IL-2 modding open, while preserving online game integrity and avoiding Oleg's intellectual property violation by mods distribution, without seriously rebuilding the game engine structure.
The later IS possible, but costs labor. Labor costs money. In the case of IL-2, it would pure waste of them in a business (or any other, including common) sense.

So, why some of you still think, Oleg should do this?
Reply With Quote
  #92  
Old 01-01-2009, 10:47 PM
LEXX LEXX is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Ussia
Posts: 276
Default

That makes good sense Saqs. Too late now to open the sim. I'd rather see Oleg open the sim years ago instead of the hack.

Quote:
As for sharing my knowledge about the game mechanics and such - I am not able to do so for an obvious reason.
Understood. Then the modders can only do the best they can without official help.
Reply With Quote
  #93  
Old 01-02-2009, 05:35 AM
SaQSoN SaQSoN is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Nowhereland
Posts: 340
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LEXX View Post
I'd rather see Oleg open the sim years ago instead of the hack.
The task of rebuilding the game engine in the way, I described above, is virtually equal to creating a new game engine from scratch.
Looking at things realistically, doing this was not an option for Oleg's team from the very beginning (original IL-2 release).

They did their best to support user's creativity by adding 3rd party models into the game for free themselves. But now, it's over, as every thing in this world ends, sooner, or later.

Quote:
Originally Posted by LEXX View Post
Understood. Then the modders can only do the best they can without official help.
While doing so, they should understand and remember, that when distributing their "mods", they, in the most cases, redistribute a part of original game without permission of it's original author. Which, by all international and most national laws is a violation of Oleg's intellectual property, no matter what the modders may think, or say about it.

Obviously, it is doubtful, that anyone would be prosecuted for this, but in my opinion, distribution of mods (in the said above regard) means showing disrespect to Oleg, his team and their work. So, I don't see any reason, why Oleg, or anyone from his team should show respect to the modders. Particularly, when their work is way far from quality standards, we choose for ourselves.

Last edited by SaQSoN; 01-02-2009 at 05:42 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #94  
Old 01-02-2009, 08:29 AM
SlipBall's Avatar
SlipBall SlipBall is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: down Island, NY
Posts: 2,719
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SaQSoN View Post
The task of rebuilding the game engine in the way, I described above, is virtually equal to creating a new game engine from scratch.
Looking at things realistically, doing this was not an option for Oleg's team from the very beginning (original IL-2 release).

They did their best to support user's creativity by adding 3rd party models into the game for free themselves. But now, it's over, as every thing in this world ends, sooner, or later.



While doing so, they should understand and remember, that when distributing their "mods", they, in the most cases, redistribute a part of original game without permission of it's original author. Which, by all international and most national laws is a violation of Oleg's intellectual property, no matter what the modders may think, or say about it.

Obviously, it is doubtful, that anyone would be prosecuted for this, but in my opinion, distribution of mods (in the said above regard) means showing disrespect to Oleg, his team and their work. So, I don't see any reason, why Oleg, or anyone from his team should show respect to the modders. Particularly, when their work is way far from quality standards, we choose for ourselves.



This for me is the biggest reason why I dislike the whole mod issue. It is stealing, and is a show of total disrespect for Oleg and his crew. It's like he has to watch people with dull scalpel's, doing surgery on his child
__________________



GigaByteBoard...64bit...FX 4300 3.8, G. Skill sniper 1866 32GB, EVGA GTX 660 ti 3gb, Raptor 64mb cache, Planar 120Hz 2ms, CH controls, Tir5
Reply With Quote
  #95  
Old 01-02-2009, 08:39 AM
311thCopperhead 311thCopperhead is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 50
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LEXX View Post
I use some Frankenplane methods in StrikeFighters, but generally for myself only. SF and FB/PF are *very* lite sims in air warfare simulation, so I'm not worried about techie 3D model details that these games' air warfare programming and features fail to match.


SaQSoN::
That's the idea, and how it works on the street. They don't have official support, so hold back the gamer insults and share your knowledge.


lol yeah. on the street. on the street you can aslo buy crack cocaine..but hey...to each there own.

not for me thanks.
Reply With Quote
  #96  
Old 01-02-2009, 01:47 PM
Wolf_Rider Wolf_Rider is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 1,677
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bearcat View Post
Man.... hush up... You don't know what you are talking about.

What makes you think that because I use mods I have pushed the developer aside? I bought several copies of 46 in 2008 alone... How many did you buy? Developer support is more than just lip service. If you have given more than that then good on you, but you are in absolutely no position whatsoever to pass judgment on anything I have done in this sim as far as supporting 1C.

You don't know what you are talking about.

I have supported this sim and it's development team from day one and will continue to do so as long as they are putting out products of this quality.


Well I guess that says it all... except justification of pushing the developer to one side...

"I bought many copies", so does that mean you now own the rights to il2?

Sorry bud but when the come back is "Hush, man" and "you don't know what you are talking about", it only indicates you know you are wrong in your stance.

Reply With Quote
  #97  
Old 01-02-2009, 03:14 PM
robtek's Avatar
robtek robtek is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,819
Default

I also fear for this community to become divided, not only "vanilla" vs "Mods/hACKs"
but als Macks vs different Macks.
But what i also wanted to say is: The reason for all this is that the developer doesn´t develop anymore for IL2.
If there would have been still support to remove the kinks and add missing planes by OM or someone named by him, i mean offically, as a pay-add-on so the workers could be paid, we wouldn´t be in the situation we are right now.
Maybe someone, who has OM´s ear, could indicate to him to Quality-control the Macks and sell the packet, if the Builders at i.e. AAA agree, as a pay-add-on where the price shoul be affordable as only the QC must be paid for.
That would be good for the community and good PR for OM and his future projects (that we buy anyway)
My 2 cents
__________________
Win 7/64 Ult.; Phenom II X6 1100T; ASUS Crosshair IV; 16 GB DDR3/1600 Corsair; ASUS EAH6950/2GB; Logitech G940 & the usual suspects
Reply With Quote
  #98  
Old 01-02-2009, 03:21 PM
carguy_ carguy_ is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: optimist
Posts: 647
Default

Thanks for your input, SaQSoN.
Reply With Quote
  #99  
Old 01-02-2009, 06:18 PM
SaQSoN SaQSoN is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Nowhereland
Posts: 340
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by robtek View Post
But what i also wanted to say is: The reason for all this is that the developer doesn´t develop anymore for IL2.
Do you think, the developers had no serious reason for dropping IL-2 support?

Quote:
Originally Posted by robtek View Post
If there would have been still support to remove the kinks and add missing planes by OM or someone named by him, i mean offically, as a pay-add-on so the workers could be paid, we wouldn´t be in the situation we are right now.
You'd be surprised, how few people would actually buy such addon and how expensive it would be in development. Sorry, but that not going to work. No add-on for IL-2 (except for some mission/campaign packs, may be) can be profitable at the moment.

IL-2 is dead as a commercial enterprise. Get on with that.
Reply With Quote
  #100  
Old 01-02-2009, 06:56 PM
Bandit Bill Bandit Bill is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 18
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SaQSoN View Post
Do you think, the developers had no serious reason for dropping IL-2 support?
Yeah, something about a vague BOB vaporware supposedly coming out at about the same time as Duke Nukem Forever..

Quote:
Originally Posted by SaQSoN View Post
IL-2 is dead as a commercial enterprise. Get on with that.
Which is why the modders took over, where Oleg et al had left off, with massive holes in the IL2 content.. Get over that.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:33 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.