Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik > Daidalos Team discussions

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #71  
Old 12-04-2015, 02:20 AM
Pursuivant Pursuivant is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 1,439
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dimlee View Post
I heard it on Il-2 but rarely. Probably on Bf-110 as well.
You hear it very occasionally. Officially, it's in all the voice packs.

Practically, it seems that very few multi-crew planes have gunners who will speak to you. The IL-2, SBD, and the Bf-110 have it, other multi-crew planes don't seem to have it. It must be something that has to be coded into the AI for each plane.

But, having a "talkative" gunner is a mixed blessing. Often their calls to break left or right are wrong, and more often than not you get the "What are you doing!" gunner freak out, which is just annoying. (After all, you're in command of the damned plane, so you should be able to tell the gunner to put up and shut up or else.)

Last edited by Pursuivant; 12-05-2015 at 06:17 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #72  
Old 12-04-2015, 02:32 AM
Pursuivant Pursuivant is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 1,439
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dimlee View Post
Just quickly draw a list: model - times mentioned in this thread.
Another good way to measure desire for planes that aren't in the game is to go to Mission 4 Today and check to see which "hack" skins are most popular. For example, A-20C or Ki-21 as Douglas Maryland or Baltimore, H8K "Emily" as Short Sunderland.
Reply With Quote
  #73  
Old 12-04-2015, 05:39 PM
dimlee's Avatar
dimlee dimlee is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Europe
Posts: 312
Default

Good ideas, Pursuivant - as usually.

About 2 engine planes additions.
Pe-3 - we miss one "late war" modification with M-105PF engines. Just 19 units were in operation, so I can't say this is first priority, but stil...
Also more weapon options are welcome for Pe-3/Pe-3bis. Rockets, may be grenades if they can be modelled (based on parafrags?). And certainly fuel tanks which were quite common, especially in Navy units.
__________________
Q: Mr. Rall, what was the best tactic against the P-47?
A: Against the P-47? Shoot him down!
(Gunther Rall's lecture. June 2003, Finland)
Reply With Quote
  #74  
Old 12-04-2015, 07:18 PM
Janosch's Avatar
Janosch Janosch is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 140
Default

I'd appreciate if the AI gunners didn't try to shoot at planes that are e.g. missing a wing, or are already being chased away by friendly escorts. What a wonderful way to waste ammunition, and give the opponents an extra opportunity to spot you from a distance!

I'd like to have the earlier Bf 110s as flyables, but that's mostly because they would fit nicely into early war scenarios and settings. The thing is, I don't think they would bring that much new to the table, gameplay wise. The Ki-45, for example, is just a Bf 110 on steroids - at a first glance, but it brought the schräge musik - cannons into the game, even if there are only so many chances to use them effectively. All in all, the early 110s addition would make more sense than some dull and/or forgettable level bombers.
Reply With Quote
  #75  
Old 12-05-2015, 06:16 AM
Pursuivant Pursuivant is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 1,439
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Janosch View Post
I'd appreciate if the AI gunners didn't try to shoot at planes that are e.g. missing a wing, or are already being chased away by friendly escorts.
Fire discipline for gunners, as well as ability to tell friend from foe, should be linked to gunner quality. Rookie gunners should do all the stupid things that AI gunners currently do, and more.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Janosch View Post
What a wonderful way to waste ammunition, and give the opponents an extra opportunity to spot you from a distance!
Exactly. Veteran gunners know those tricks. Rookies are likely to forget in the heat of battle.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Janosch View Post
I'd like to have the earlier Bf 110s as flyables, but that's mostly because they would fit nicely into early war scenarios and settings.
There's also the problem that many of the proposed new planes don't have proper maps where they can fly.

For example, a plane like the Spitfire Mk V or Tempest seem most "natural" on an English Channel map that stretches from Dover to Calais, rather than over Normandy. Rare birds like the IK-3 or the PZL.11c literally have no map to call home.

Ideally, new aircraft should also come with an appropriate map to fly over. For example, the Adriatic Coast for the IK-3, or the Polish coast for the PZL.11c.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Janosch View Post
All in all, the early 110s addition would make more sense than some dull and/or forgettable level bombers.
More variants of existing planes would make sense, but there are a few places where there are gaps in a particular country's "Order of Battle," and it isn't appropriate to use an earlier/later model of an existing plane.
Reply With Quote
  #76  
Old 12-14-2015, 08:48 AM
iMattheush iMattheush is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Warsaw, Poland
Posts: 51
Default

In some mods there are also beautiful models of PZL.37B "Łoś", and it will be nice to see it, even AI only... But definitely easier is to bring us earlier models of Bf 110 B/C
Reply With Quote
  #77  
Old 12-14-2015, 11:58 AM
gaunt1 gaunt1 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: India
Posts: 314
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by iMattheush View Post
In some mods there are also beautiful models of PZL.37B "Łoś", and it will be nice to see it, even AI only... But definitely easier is to bring us earlier models of Bf 110 B/C
Pilot's cockpit for Bf 110C is indeed relatively easy to make, some instruments are arranged a bit differently, thats all. The problem is rear gunner, that is totally different unfortunately. Especially, the opening part of the canopy for the MG. (an interim solution would be that gunner is AI only. This way, we could have more important variants, like the best of the 110 line, the F2, or the long range D)

I'd really like to see a Ju-88C6a too, I think it is also not that hard to make. Most of the cockpit could be ported straight from A4.
Reply With Quote
  #78  
Old 12-14-2015, 04:56 PM
majorfailure majorfailure is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 320
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gaunt1 View Post
an interim solution would be that gunner is AI only. This way, we could have more important variants, like the best of the 110 line, the F2, or the long range D
Always wondered why that is not a viable solution, considering that most pilots will not ever use the rear gunner and in IL-2 Field mod its not different(for other reasons, okay).
Reply With Quote
  #79  
Old 12-14-2015, 11:29 PM
Tinpanzer87 Tinpanzer87 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: The deep south
Posts: 22
Default

JU-88 Night fighter . Flyable FW-189
Reply With Quote
  #80  
Old 12-16-2015, 04:40 AM
Pursuivant Pursuivant is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 1,439
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by majorfailure View Post
Always wondered why that is not a viable solution, considering that most pilots will not ever use the rear gunner and in IL-2 Field mod its not different(for other reasons, okay).
Plenty of pilots will use the tail gunner - at least in some situations.

For example, it's sometimes handy to do a quick "jump" to your rear gunner's station just prior to combat, or during a lull, to get a read on the situation to your rear.

As another example, if you're flying a mission where you have to fly straight and level to and from the target, and you run into fighters along the way, then often it's more effective, and fun, to man a gunner's station.

But, your point is valid. If the IL2 game has managed to have one of the original planes in the game - the IL2 FM - without a rear gunner station for all these years, then why not make more planes flyable by just adding a cockpit?
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:19 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.