Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik

IL-2 Sturmovik The famous combat flight simulator.

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1491  
Old 11-01-2008, 04:55 PM
Dalsvzla Dalsvzla is offline
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 5
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dalsvzla View Post
Hi Oleg,

First thank for answer all question did in this forum.

1- will exist bomb view in BOB??
2- BOB will have posibilities to go back (rewind) on plays of tracks?
3- Do exist anyway to put a direct ground object view instead have to put a cam on mission builder?

Thanks
Hi Oleg,

You didnt see my question i guess.

Thanks.
  #1492  
Old 11-01-2008, 07:16 PM
robtek's Avatar
robtek robtek is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,819
Default

@proton

you realize that the explosions in your pictures are pure hollywood and have only a very distant relation to reality??
__________________
Win 7/64 Ult.; Phenom II X6 1100T; ASUS Crosshair IV; 16 GB DDR3/1600 Corsair; ASUS EAH6950/2GB; Logitech G940 & the usual suspects
  #1493  
Old 11-06-2008, 10:26 AM
SlipBall's Avatar
SlipBall SlipBall is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: down Island, NY
Posts: 2,719
Default

Hi Oleg, I would like to ask if you might release a small sound example in one of your up-coming game updates...109E at idle speed inside the pit would be
__________________



GigaByteBoard...64bit...FX 4300 3.8, G. Skill sniper 1866 32GB, EVGA GTX 660 ti 3gb, Raptor 64mb cache, Planar 120Hz 2ms, CH controls, Tir5
  #1494  
Old 11-06-2008, 11:40 AM
proton45's Avatar
proton45 proton45 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 651
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by robtek View Post
@proton

you realize that the explosions in your pictures are pure hollywood and have only a very distant relation to reality??

So...it doesn't change the idea. I just used the "gas" explosions as an eye catcher...

p.s. we could see gas explode in the context of the game...aviation fuel in barrels ect.
  #1495  
Old 11-06-2008, 01:44 PM
Baco Baco is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 24
Default

Oleg, with all due respect. If a "more complex" cockpit control or engine start is such a watse of time, why did you include take offs and landings or even an eject sequence for Il2 if its unnecesary. When you get shot down, it doesn´t matter if you eject or not, or whay take off at all, why did you give us the choice of taking off, (to make the feeling more inmersive) and yet you don´t want to give us the choice of transfering fuel from tank to tank, or select magnetos or turning on the bateries... we don´t need much, just a little more than in Il-2. Ususally setting the cockpit and doing stuff befor taking off sets the mood, the amience, to get in the role of a fighterpilot, not just a kid palying a "planes game".... Every new sim has more and more interactivity than previosu ones.. It feels that leaving the SOW series out of that trend like if you would still continue to do movies in Mono sound and not use stereo...and Sounf FX and that kind of thing...

Why not enchance the experience of being there for those who ant it?
  #1496  
Old 11-06-2008, 02:01 PM
ECV56_LeChuck ECV56_LeChuck is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 102
Default

Agree with Baco
  #1497  
Old 11-06-2008, 05:18 PM
Chivas Chivas is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,769
Default

I don't want a totally realistic start procedure, but mapping a couple of switches, fuel pump, and start button to a hotas or keyboard that must be set right for the engine to start creates a hightened immersion. Hearing the engine cranking over, and not being totally sure it will fire is an immersion factor that shouldn't be left out of SOW, especially in scramble situations.
  #1498  
Old 11-06-2008, 06:33 PM
SlipBall's Avatar
SlipBall SlipBall is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: down Island, NY
Posts: 2,719
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chivas View Post
I don't want a totally realistic start procedure, but mapping a couple of switches, fuel pump, and start button to a hotas or keyboard that must be set right for the engine to start creates a hightened immersion. Hearing the engine cranking over, and not being totally sure it will fire is an immersion factor that shouldn't be left out of SOW, especially in scramble situations.


Yes I agree...also, I would love to have the engine a bit tempermental on the winter map's. I wonder if Oleg will have temperature affecting fluids
__________________



GigaByteBoard...64bit...FX 4300 3.8, G. Skill sniper 1866 32GB, EVGA GTX 660 ti 3gb, Raptor 64mb cache, Planar 120Hz 2ms, CH controls, Tir5
  #1499  
Old 11-06-2008, 08:03 PM
ECV56_LeChuck ECV56_LeChuck is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 102
Default

Yeah... I think that all here agree with a simple engine start sequence, but a little more complex than in IL-2 with battery, fuel tank selector, maybe a primer, two or three more commands, and ready to go. PLEASE!!
  #1500  
Old 11-07-2008, 07:38 AM
Bobb4 Bobb4 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 553
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Baco View Post
Oleg, with all due respect. If a "more complex" cockpit control or engine start is such a watse of time, why did you include take offs and landings or even an eject sequence for Il2 if its unnecesary. When you get shot down, it doesn´t matter if you eject or not, or whay take off at all, why did you give us the choice of taking off, (to make the feeling more inmersive) and yet you don´t want to give us the choice of transfering fuel from tank to tank, or select magnetos or turning on the bateries... we don´t need much, just a little more than in Il-2. Ususally setting the cockpit and doing stuff befor taking off sets the mood, the amience, to get in the role of a fighterpilot, not just a kid palying a "planes game".... Every new sim has more and more interactivity than previosu ones.. It feels that leaving the SOW series out of that trend like if you would still continue to do movies in Mono sound and not use stereo...and Sounf FX and that kind of thing...

Why not enchance the experience of being there for those who ant it?


Obviously people have not read what Qleg has said on the matter.
Basically it is a compromise for the online community who would not enjoy spending ten to twenty minutes going through realistic starts up procedures.
Lock-on has all the bells and whistles, look what a great commercial hit that was.

He has already indicated it will be a bit more realistic.
But imagine flying in an HIII in WW2, you would spend 20 minutes on the ground as your squad slowly circles above until it is your turn to take-off.
You might enjoy it the first time you do it in single player but after a few months????

I am more interested in damage model and FM than bells and whistles.
"Wow look I spent ten minutes inflight transfering fuel from my damaged right wing tank to my central one..."

Things I would like to see is a gunner kill does not shut-down your rear guns for long in a large bomber in real life someone else would take over over time.
but an entire mission flown without a rear gunner because of one lucky burst is unrealistic.
Pilots should have the option of reassigning crew positions.
When all is said and done IL2 was a survey sim and so will SOW be. That requires some compromise.
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:14 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.