Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik

IL-2 Sturmovik The famous combat flight simulator.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 11-01-2008, 09:12 PM
flyingbullseye flyingbullseye is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 185
Default

I wonder how much copy right protection SOWBOB really needs. Even though its graphics should be incredable this is still a flight sim and one that won't have a small learning curve like the typical FPS. The average customer won't pick it up and become an instant ace, leaving it to a smaller segment of the customer base, us. With a smaller customer base compared to the likes of Crysis or UT3 it just may not be as attractive to the pirates who want to make a ill gotten buck. Now the noob hacks who want to rack up a lot of cheap kills online may be more of a problem than illegal pirating.

Flyingbullseye
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 11-01-2008, 10:35 PM
nearmiss nearmiss is offline
Global Moderator
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,687
Default

I gotta repeat it... a little differently.

I hate the existing piracy protections schemes that mess with my system, i,e. boonty box, starforce, etc.

I hate piracy more, because it makes thieves out of otherwise decent people. It is terribly unfair to the developers of music, films, videos or software.

The piracy sites are making money off their advertisers, and you'll never stop that without some type of government intervention.

If Oleg wants to use a piracy protection on BOB SOW, just because it's Oleg I'll participate. Oleg, has done and plans to do another masterful job on the finest CFS ever. The guy deserves out support and bending his way abit may mean we make choices we're not altogether happy about.

It is not good for Oleg to put up his work and have it pirated all over the web. The Pacfic Fighters was on the piracy sites, before the boxes for the release were printed. This must have been the biggest neg out imaginable to Oleg and his development team.

Honestly, I admire Oleg for continuing with the series. The guy is one in a million, because most everyone else would have just said "Scr$w it and gone on to something easier to do, and more profitable".
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 11-02-2008, 07:03 AM
tagTaken2's Avatar
tagTaken2 tagTaken2 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 207
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nearmiss View Post
The guy deserves out support and bending his way abit may mean we make choices we're not altogether happy about.
Speak for yourself.

I will be making choices I'm happy with, and that includes knocking the SoW series back if I'm uncomfortable with the CP protection. And believe me, I'm looking forward to SoW everybit as much as you.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 11-02-2008, 12:23 PM
nearmiss nearmiss is offline
Global Moderator
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,687
Default

I mentioned above... I didn't buy PE-2 because I didn't want the Starforce or Boonty Box thingy, and I've never bought any of the followup releases of the Lock-On after the first release for the same reason.

There is nothing I'm putting on my computer to corrupt it for any game.

I'm just hoping Oleg can address the issue of piracy and still provide us a competent workable situation for protection of his software.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 11-02-2008, 08:57 PM
WTE_Galway WTE_Galway is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,207
Default

I know a few people that refuse to use games that run securerom (the protection system used on non-US 1946 DVDs) because of the way it interferes with apps like itunes and Nero.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 11-03-2008, 07:43 AM
HFC_Dolphin HFC_Dolphin is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 340
Default

In any case, I have to agree that any copy protection scheme that interferes badly with (some) PCs will force people who would buy the game to illegal copies, just to avoid this potential problem.

I say "potential" cause big problem with all this fancy protection schemes, is that no one can know for sure if they will affect his system badly or not and thus everyone prefers to not deal with them. Forums are full of legitimate customers who faced tremendous problems by stupid copy protection schemes.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 11-03-2008, 07:23 PM
Supah Supah is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 25
Default

Oleg should do it like musical artists, be screwed over by the record company on CD sales but make a killing on concerts ..... though I am not sure If I'd go to see a Oleg concert
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 11-03-2008, 09:33 PM
SlipBall's Avatar
SlipBall SlipBall is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: down Island, NY
Posts: 2,719
Default

I understand the need to have something in place. Agree in the hope, that it's not too agressive
__________________



GigaByteBoard...64bit...FX 4300 3.8, G. Skill sniper 1866 32GB, EVGA GTX 660 ti 3gb, Raptor 64mb cache, Planar 120Hz 2ms, CH controls, Tir5
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:54 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.