Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik > Daidalos Team discussions

View Poll Results: Would you support a project like this?
Yes, with up to U$ 20 34 52.31%
Yes, with between U$20 and u$50 13 20.00%
Yes, with more than u$50 3 4.62%
No, not at all... 15 23.08%
Voters: 65. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 02-27-2013, 11:09 PM
mmaruda mmaruda is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 43
Default

I'm kind of short on money, so my vote unfortunately would be no. If we were talking about a higher fidelity addon than standard IL-2 planes, I might consider a donation.

Before you all start hating on me, let me just say, that for some time now, I have been swimming in the DCS pond and while I still love IL-2, I don't play it almost at all. It's still on my hard drive waiting for the new patch, but unfortunately, IL-2 the way it is has grown kind of old to me. Not the level of realism and challenge I have grown used to by study sims, not as much fun as it used to be, call it a "been there, done that" syndrome. So a single payware plane doesn't cut it for me, I'd rather save the cash for some more modern sim.

I might consider, if it was a larger addon, something that would take IL-2 to the next level, but a single plane... There is already 200+ machines here, and I mainly fly fighters, so there is enough planes for me. Also, $50 for an IL-2 level simulation of a single plane is too much IMHO. That is the price for a full study-sim module for DCS, like the Mustang or something.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 02-28-2013, 04:12 AM
GF_Mastiff's Avatar
GF_Mastiff GF_Mastiff is offline
71st_Mastiff
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: EL Centro
Posts: 890
Default

I payed for the last-one were is it?
__________________
71st Eagle Squadron
www.anon6.com - Blogger on DCS Series
71st Mastiff's You-Tube
" any failure you meet is never a defeat; merely a set up for a greater come back "
Asus||i7x5930k||16gb3200||GTX10808gb||ATX1200Corsa ir||CBTitanium7.1||Win10x64||TrackIr4Pro/ir||gladiator pro mkII||siatekpedals||X52Throttle||G15Keyboard/RazerMouse||
32"LCD||2x7" lilliputs,1x9inc
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 02-28-2013, 08:38 AM
EJGr.Ost_Caspar EJGr.Ost_Caspar is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 939
Default

What?
__________________

----------------------------------------------
For bugreports, help and support contact:
daidalos.team@googlemail.com

For modelers - The IL-2 standard modeling specifications:
IL-Modeling Bible
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 02-28-2013, 10:47 AM
Fighterace Fighterace is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 269
Default

Is paying for a particular aircraft seriously being considered?
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 02-28-2013, 11:05 AM
ECV56_Guevara ECV56_Guevara is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Planeta Trampa
Posts: 248
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GF_Mastiff View Post
I payed for the last-one were is it?
Please, explain yourself.


Figtherace, SVK community did it an I guess Russian too with the P-8. I made this poll to know if banana forum members were able to do the same. There are positive answers at least to pay acomplete a external model. We need a project lead. Or we could support the SVK community project and help finish the He 177 cockpit if they need it. Hey Magot are you reading this?
__________________

Bombing smurfs since a long time ago...
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 02-28-2013, 02:31 PM
1984 1984 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 152
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ECV56_Guevara View Post
I made this poll to know if banana forum members were able to do the same. There are positive answers at least to pay acomplete a external model. We need a project lead.
just for interest, you can create topic about "what we REALLY need?" (or we can to write here) - although i think it's not really constructive, too much wishes for too much sides and too much specific type of users here, but not so much users in total - maybe, we can try...

for example, yes, we can help with he-177 (for example, with one of gunners, personally i think what pilot, bomberman and one gunner it's enough ie minimum), well, good late german bomber in game, and it's enough...

by the way, it's bad translation, or magot wrote about beta-cockpit for do-217 in alpha-4.12?

next, i remember about russian "project of cargo plane" or something like this, which was similar with "pe-8", well, cargo plane like li-2/c-47 it's really not bad choice for many players...

we can think about new correct 3d models for fw 190s or il-2 (in fact, at least just need one new 3d model of il-2 one-seater with some little differents, and it's could be normal plane for 41-44 with am-38/am-38f, shvaks/vya-23, different sights, rockets etc, last mention about these ils which i read - yassi'44)... or just about fw 190 a-2 (a-3 very similar with a-4, a-1,2 it's "another" plane and if i'm not mistaken, planes used even in 43 at soviet-german front)... about p-51 with allison (planes, almost like p-40, used in many countrys, even in USSR)... catalina (planes were used in many countrys, in ussr too)... just examples... etc...

lot of really needful, interesting things and wishes for real gameplay, which need now, which too much for one team like DT, and which we must to wait in other games too long...

and by the way, personally i can give priority for german/allied or even some japanese/french planes, because, if i'm not mistaken or not forgot something, for real use on soviet-german front needs mainly some series of planes, historically correct performances and weapons ie not so much and this theatre now well for online-wars or scenarios...

or, at least, we just could help DT to understand what most needful in society...

well, just my thoughts...
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 02-28-2013, 02:52 PM
ECV56_Guevara ECV56_Guevara is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Planeta Trampa
Posts: 248
Default

Hey 1984, you re rigth.
I was thinking in something simple, a Lysander for example.
But why not reunite all efforts? Why not to help svk community to finish He 177 cockpit? And then maybe start a new fundraising and make a new plane.
I wrote to Magot. Let s wait.
__________________

Bombing smurfs since a long time ago...
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 02-28-2013, 04:10 PM
Sita Sita is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 943
Default

+ me
Attached Images
File Type: jpeg shut-up-and-take-my-money11.jpeg (113.3 KB, 7 views)
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 02-28-2013, 04:12 PM
Sita Sita is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 943
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 1984 View Post
personally i gived money for "pe-8" and thinking about this here too (500 рублей=15-20 dollars), in total, all this strange, but normal at this moment, but i don't know how i can do this without problems...

for pe8 i did it three time by 500 рублей

Last edited by Sita; 02-28-2013 at 04:46 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 02-28-2013, 10:28 PM
1984 1984 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 152
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ECV56_Guevara View Post
Hey 1984, you re rigth.
I was thinking in something simple, a Lysander for example.
something like lysander mk III or mk IIIa? well, why not, although for us/uk-german/pacific fronts need very much important things like maps, ground targets, planes (typhoons, mustangs with allison, several bombers)...

Quote:
I wrote to Magot. Let s wait.
ok...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sita View Post
for pe8 i did it three time by 500 рублей
you are very rich...

if seriously, i fast checked soviet planes, well, really need only planes like er-2 (just good bomber), su-2 (important early attack plane), li-2 (c-47 in fact), tu-2 (late fast bomber) and mbr-2 (maybe, better catalina for all)...

other planes not so important for gameplay, it's yak-4 (very similar with pe-2, so), yak-6 and ще-2 (very "soviet" cargo-planes, better think about c-47 for all), r-10 (very similar with su-2, so), ut-1b/uti-4 and sh-2 (mainly for fun) etc...

other planes it's lend-lease (here list of planes, but with many small errors ie just for interest)...

well, no so much, and personally i think what have reasons only for su-2/li-2/tu-2 or new model, for example, of il-2 one-seater...
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:51 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.