Announcement of the game "IL-2 Sturmovik: Battle of Stalingrad"

[Troll2k]

My activation email was in the spam folder.Check there.

[taildraggernut]

Originally Posted by Troll2k

My activation email was in the spam folder.Check there.

I still haven't got an activation email and it's not in the spam folder.

[kristorf]

They 'filtering' already????

[TomcatViP]

Guys we are here today because there still was ppl supporting the business model of RoF. You know, them, those guys, adult mainly, with pay check, only happy when they get the next Godzilla plane that change the aspect of the war in the sky ard them and turn them in Imperator able to nail any young child un-lucky to be more talented than themselves.

It's the return of the kingdom rules: no horses and Excalibur for the poor pageant ! ... the winter of our discontent...

[el0375]

In short, despite the shortcomings i felt that clod satisfied me the most. gave me the closest impression of flying + the CEM stuff. The whole thing: from the plane on the ground, taking off, being on air, returning back. A satisfaction of passing the whole process that neither the old il2 gave me, nor ROF, nor FSX , no other game i played to date apart CLOD.


Rof is good and i praise them that they keep it good and with new content until now but i liked much more Clod. Nor i usually buy sigle planes too/dlc( also because i buy most of my stuff on cd/retailer) i tend and wait for expansions.

For ROF i am happy , i was much about Clod and sad to see it go.
about this new venture i hope to be able to keep the scope and the feeling it was able to give inside the copit.

Anyways i ll wait and see and wish good for this too

P.S i dont want to see a bomber to cost much because it has many gauges etc. nor i can think of selling versions of bf as separate planes ( i.e. the e3, e3b,e4 to f etc).

[swift]

Originally Posted by Skoshi Tiger

Fantastic!
.
..
...
Hmmm!



Pitty really, the Cod engine had so much going for it!

I whole heartedly agree. The engine was fantastic - alas the management not so much. Now we get a drilled up Rof engine which is imho dated and limited for what should be possible in a ww2 sim of high standard. This is in no way meant to belittle Rof and its engine. It is just much older and much more limited.

[Al Schlageter]

Originally Posted by Friendly_flyer

Same here. I have tried different browsers. Whenever I want to create an account I get "Allowed only latin characters and numbers", despite my password being just Latin characters and numbers.

ditto here, sort of. Got logged in with the activication but when going back later, no joy.

Hope this is not a sign of things to come.

[Osprey]

Originally Posted by J.Reb

I paid money in good faith for CLoD, and never received the working product.

Will you return my money?

Hit your steam COD update and you have the working product.

[ZaltysZ]

Originally Posted by robtek

The CoD engine, at least, is limited by its bugs, not its design.

Yeah, but maybe devs feel limited by design of CoD. It may seem different to end users, but in practice it is uncommon to ditch a software project just because of bugs in it, unless fixing them means redesigning and rewriting significantly large part of the project, what implies damage done by bad project management and/or bad architectural design. I doubt CoD has been killed without 1C coming to conclusion that it is not worth to be fixed (speaking strictly from software development point of view).

[SlipBall]

Originally Posted by Al Schlageter

ditto here, sort of. Got logged in with the activication but when going back later, no joy.

Hope this is not a sign of things to come.

Make sure everything is exactly as you first submitted....I could not log in the first day, turns out I had enter a coma instead of a period when signing in with e-mail name.

,com