Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik

IL-2 Sturmovik The famous combat flight simulator.

View Poll Results: do you know flugwerk company a her real one fockewulf a8?
yes 2 33.33%
no 4 66.67%
Voters: 6. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-20-2012, 10:20 PM
ElAurens's Avatar
ElAurens ElAurens is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: The Great Black Swamp of Ohio
Posts: 2,185
Default

Please keep going Gaston, I've never laughed so hard about an FM girlie fight in my entire time with IL2.

Just remember, if you keep repeating untruths enough people will grow tired and leave the discussion and you can claim a "win".

It's called the "big lie", and it was invented by the Germans as well...
__________________


Personally speaking, the P-40 could contend on an equal footing with all the types of Messerschmitts, almost to the end of 1943.
~Nikolay Gerasimovitch Golodnikov
  #2  
Old 11-20-2012, 10:27 PM
K_Freddie K_Freddie is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 563
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ElAurens View Post
It's called the "big lie", and it was invented by the Germans as well...
You sound like the PR guy sending the 8th or any fighter command to Germany 1943-5.. I'm sure they just loved you
__________________
  #3  
Old 11-20-2012, 10:44 PM
K_Freddie K_Freddie is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 563
Default

JtD...
It seems like Gaston has done a few years of research into combat reports (if he claims right), maybe on a project of sorts.

Aerodynamics and models are accurate, no doubt to a certain %, but have they been verified under certain and specific conditions.
For the aircraft under question, most likely not, considering the conditions of the time. That leaves us with what... theoretical values, or 'real experiences'.

Every research into the past relies on Current Knowledge and Statistics. Gaston is the Statistics of this research.
What aerodynamic proponents are arguing are static test results, if you can call them that, and not dynamic as they quiet simply do not have the same aircraft in question.

__________________

Last edited by K_Freddie; 11-20-2012 at 10:47 PM.
  #4  
Old 11-20-2012, 10:53 PM
Glider Glider is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 441
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by K_Freddie View Post
JtD...
It seems like Gaston has done a few years of research into combat reports (if he claims right), maybe on a project of sorts.
Must be the worst research I have ever seen. None of his claims stacks up and he will not tell us where in the 'research' the evidence supports his claim.
  #5  
Old 11-20-2012, 11:02 PM
K_Freddie K_Freddie is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 563
Default

You must have missed it...
You must also clarify his claim ?
__________________

Last edited by K_Freddie; 11-20-2012 at 11:06 PM.
  #6  
Old 11-21-2012, 12:03 AM
MaxGunz MaxGunz is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 471
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by K_Freddie View Post
You must have missed it...
You must also clarify his claim ?
Every one of his claims have been shot down multiple times on presentation, that's a fact.

Both of you have weird ideas on how much is not known and fail to acknowledge not only how much is known but the nature of that knowledge. But then both of you live in special worlds where physics is only what you choose to understand. Nothing is true until you make the mistake of admitting it.

JTD can in 2 minutes find multiple accounts of what Gaston swears there are none.
To which your answer is that you have been around longer than that.
Yeah, you really showed HIM!
  #7  
Old 11-21-2012, 05:05 AM
K_Freddie K_Freddie is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 563
Default

Yeah, and those reports are not relevant to the envelope Gaston is talking about.. You really showed us haven't you !!

A matter of fact that none of you have come up with a decent counter argument, or proof therof, beyond reasonable doubt that Gaston is talking tripe.
You all revert back to aerodynamic formulae and charts, most of which are from pilots that you wish to discredit, so where does that leave your argument.
While aerodynamics does play a significant role, most of you are not willing to remotely admit that there might be a problem with the data, in the area that is in discussion.

If I were a test pilot, I'll be crying with laughter.
__________________

Last edited by K_Freddie; 11-21-2012 at 05:11 AM.
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:30 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.