![]() |
#41
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
It's like Il-2 in its heyday, with better graphics. CEM enthusiasts will need to look elsewhere however.
|
#42
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
CEM mode is available. Not sure if it works properly since FMs are not fine-tuned yet.
|
#43
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Thanks. |
#44
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Should be really easy to find out for yourself rather soon. Open Beta for WT should open internationally soon, it's opened in Russia yesterday, so everyone can try it for free.
MAC |
#45
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
MAC |
#46
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Seems a case of calling post-processing "good graphics." I don't care for the look, and I AM a graphics junkie. I take to simulation about as well as a brick takes to water. In my IL2 days, I used to joke that you always knew when the battle started: I was already a spectator.
|
#47
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
War thunder may look good but When playing, I found that it has very poor Damage Model. Damage model is not the area which can be enhanced easily. I don't want to play it.
I believe both CLOD and War thunder will be enhaced later but I guess I'll stand at CLOD side. Last edited by Desgobbi; 11-07-2012 at 07:01 AM. |
#48
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
The prop animation is worse than Clodo's. Didn't think that was possible.
RedToo. |
#49
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Well these graphics look pretty nice but if you look here and in other shots it seems that they have made a weird error on the 109 canopy the angle going up on the side looks too steep. Too straight up and down if you will and too wide at the top.
Last edited by Richie; 11-15-2012 at 06:09 AM. |
#50
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
- If it is nowhere near the real size of Southern England + the Channel + NW France then I cannot agree that it is better "in all aspects".
__________________
My Il-2 CoD video web site: www.flightsimvids.com |
![]() |
|
|