![]() |
|
IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games. |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
RC means release candidate, it sits between being a beta and a final release.
__________________
Intel Q9550 @3.3ghz(OC), Asus rampage extreme MOBO, Nvidia GTX470 1.2Gb Vram, 8Gb DDR3 Ram, Win 7 64bit ultimate edition |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
RC = "Release Candidate", it means that the beta patch is nearly completed and almost good enough to be an official "final patch". it is a "candidate" (eg eligable) for release (soon)
it usually means that most elements they are working on are near finished, and they are confident it is almost ready to be given official status. it is released in this "condition" as a final check to look for some final residual issues and bugs they might not have had extensive enough testing for "in house", so they release it to the public for feedback. big companies with large software programs can go through a series of Release Candidate patches (eg RC1, RC2, RC3 etc..) that they release to their beta testers as they get closer to releasing the final product (microsoft usually does this with their main programs). other smaller software houses might just have a RC1 and maybe RC2, and then produce the final patch/program looking at the amount of residual problems and some new bugs in the latest beta patch, i'd say they are nowhere near having a final patch ready, and will need a big push focused on dealing with all the major bugs/errors and add some missing features, quiet a big job ![]() ![]()
__________________
President Dwight D. Eisenhower 1953: Every gun that is made, every warship launched, every rocket fired signifies, in the final sense, a theft from those who hunger and are not fed, those who are cold and are not clothed. This world in arms is not spending money alone, it is spending the sweat of its laborers, the genius of its scientists, the hopes of its children Last edited by zapatista; 09-29-2012 at 05:33 PM. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Wow! What a nightmare. They fix the RAF plane speeds, but you can't start them! They return clouds with shadows, but you get them flying over the clouds too. They make targets easier, to see, but now you can see them through clouds. They break the real Battle of Britain fighters but include a stunt plane with lazers?
And this the nearly final patch is?oh this must be a joke, right? Nice one Ilya! |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Well, it does look quite good, for a video game circa 2008 - 2010.
Disclaimer: haven't tried it with the RC patch while sober (afraid to). |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Not sure if I want to download my easter Egg.
Happy with my old piece of Xmas cake! .
__________________
. ======================================== . .....--oOo-- --oOo-- HE-111 --oOo-- --oOo--..... . ======================================== -oOo- Intel i7-2600K (non-clocked) -oOo- GA-P67A -oOo- DF 85 full tower -oOo- 1000W corsair -oOo- 8 GB 1600Hz -oOo- 2 x GTX 580 1.5M (295.73) -oOo- 240 SSD -oOo- W7 64bit -oOo- PB2700 LED 2560 x 1440 6ms 60Hz -oOo- ======================================== |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() ![]() If we don't want to buy BOM we should at least have the sim we bought working. This should NOT be a option where you have to buy product B to get product A working ,that is called blackmail. |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I say it tantamout to theft or deception.
__________________
Regards Chris ![]() http://www.aircombatgroup.co.uk/index.php Gigabyte z77-d3h, Intel Core i5-3570K 3.40GHz (OC 4.2GHz), Corsair Vengeance Low Profile 24GB DDR3 PC3-12800C9 1600MHz Dual Channel Kit , Samsung 120GB SSD 840 SATA 6Gb/s Basic, Seagate Barracuda 7200RPM 1TB SATA 6Gb/s 64MB, Cooling Silencer Mk II 750W '80 Plus Silver' PSU, GTX580 3gb OC |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Luthier-
"The situation sucks. I see no reason to sugarcoat it with bull. I don't want to go make empty promises or try to prove that black is white. We released a faulty game. We did more than even seemed possible to fix its faults and add improvements, but in the end it was not enough. There has to come a point where we begin to focus on the future, and Cliffs of Dover just becomes something we can all learn from" http://forum.1cpublishing.eu/showthr...553#post465553 Last edited by icarus; 10-01-2012 at 01:29 AM. |
![]() |
|
|