Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik > Daidalos Team discussions

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-29-2012, 01:24 AM
RegRag1977 RegRag1977 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 139
Question Bf109 G4 why not?

Would be good to have an alternative to the Bf109G2, why not give us a G4? It would give something less dominant between 42 and 43...
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-29-2012, 01:32 AM
spiteful21k spiteful21k is offline
Registered Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 4
Default Ships

What I have never quite understood is why there is no AAA defence on the freighters. Maybe a standard 20mm on the bow and stern as this was a fairly standard calibre for all beligerents.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-29-2012, 01:36 AM
Fighterace Fighterace is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 269
Default

Does the B-29 3Dmodel need any rework? THe grey disc of the prop spinning looks over-done?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-29-2012, 02:01 AM
~BeoWolf~ ~BeoWolf~ is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Hanford, CA.
Posts: 24
Default

Just saw the latest update, love you can pick skins for static aircraft. Lots of good stuff for FMB............. BUT.......... and it's big BUT, I'd still like to see a gui button for formation style. Don't see why it would be hard to do, you can pick the formation you are leading in game with Tab/comms. I'd like to be able to set all of the flights I make into the correct formation type for the mission. Instead of SBD's forming in Finger four to the left for all flights I'd like to make them form up in eschelon left and right, attack planes usually flew in eschelond. I'd like to make Vic flights for BoB missions, etc....etc...etc....

a gui switch in FMB to do this would be a very powerful mission building tool

Been asking and hoping now for years that this would finally get done before IL-2 is given up on and no longer modded.

So if you guys can swing it I'm sure it would be a very appreciated option for mission builders.

Thanks

Hoss
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-29-2012, 03:05 PM
Fighterace Fighterace is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 269
Default

Some Ju-88 Heavy fighters, Ground attack &/or Night fighters
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-29-2012, 07:04 PM
Wolkenbeisser Wolkenbeisser is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 37
Default

Request: A selectable "blank" in the fields "Staffel" and "Nummer" in the loadout-screen of dogfight missions.
Why: Because I want to be able to find the carrier with my own skin.

What I mean?
On a dogfight map, where your homebase has a country (any country except "none") you are forced to select a "Staffel number" and a plane "number". But if you want to fly with a skin, that already has a number on it, your plane shows two numbers in game (= ugly). Well, as a mission-builder you can tell me "just select 'none' in the coutry-field, when you set the homebase on the map". But that's no option. If you want to receive the signal from the directional beacon of an US-carrier, you have to fly as an US-country (USAAF, USN, USMC). Just a red homebase with country "none" does not work.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-29-2012, 07:08 PM
Wolkenbeisser Wolkenbeisser is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 37
Default

Engine startup of P-51B and C (and RAF-Mustang) shows smoke only on one side of the enginge. Would be nice to see this corrected.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10-02-2012, 04:57 PM
1984 1984 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 152
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RegRag1977 View Post
Would be good to have an alternative to the Bf109G2, why not give us a G4? It would give something less dominant between 42 and 43...
+1, yak-7b without gargrot and bf109g-4 it's what really need for historical correct soviet-german front'43...

and, maybe, it's time for correct 1.3/1.42 ata perfomance...
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 10-02-2012, 05:51 PM
Lagarto Lagarto is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 236
Default

I have one, simple wish for 4.12 - remove the lettering "MISSION COMPLETE" flashing right in the middle of the screen. Please.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 10-02-2012, 05:58 PM
Ala13_Kokakolo Ala13_Kokakolo is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 83
Default

Sorry for bother again, but there is one from the list of sugestions I would like a word from Daidalos and it is about engine temperatures. Is there any plans of get even more realistic this IL2 aspect? I mean, as I explained in a previous post, in the current situation the lower temperatures of the engine (i.e. long descent with cowling flaps open in a winter map) has no impact on the engine. I am not asking for a "plane by plane" acurate behaviour, a more "one fits all" will make me a happy man.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 02:33 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.