Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover

IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games.

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-28-2012, 06:01 PM
zapatista's Avatar
zapatista zapatista is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,172
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Force10 View Post
LOL! I almost feel sorry for Ace, he thinks that when luthier pops his head in once every 6 months for a patch announcement that equals "good customer relations". It's sad really.
so in the last 2 months we have had 2 more patches and several appearances by luthier indicating progress (as well as semi-regular appearances from black6 with bits of news, err yes some a bit cryptic i grant that, but indicating communication nevertheless) and that he will try and answer questions, and all you can do is still focus on the negative ?

right now things are looking pretty good

why not go and test the latest patch and try and come up with some positive and negative elements, might be a bit more productive me thinks (presuming you are here because you are interested in getting a good ww2 aircraft simulator)
__________________
President Dwight D. Eisenhower 1953: Every gun that is made, every warship launched, every rocket fired signifies, in the final sense, a theft from those who hunger and are not fed, those who are cold and are not clothed. This world in arms is not spending money alone, it is spending the sweat of its laborers, the genius of its scientists, the hopes of its children
  #2  
Old 09-28-2012, 06:05 PM
Force10 Force10 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 371
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by zapatista View Post

why not go and test the latest patch and try and come up with some positive and negative elements, might be a bit more productive me thinks (presuming you are here because you are interested in getting a good ww2 aircraft simulator)
That's exactly what I'm asking of Ace to do before he steps up to the podium and starts his patch praising spewage before he even knows how it works.
  #3  
Old 09-28-2012, 06:20 PM
Force10 Force10 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 371
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by zapatista View Post
so in the last 2 months we have had 2 more patches and several appearances by luthier indicating progress (as well as semi-regular appearances from black6 with bits of news, err yes some a bit cryptic i grant that, but indicating communication nevertheless) and that he will try and answer questions, and all you can do is still focus on the negative ?

right now things are looking pretty good

why not go and test the latest patch and try and come up with some positive and negative elements, might be a bit more productive me thinks (presuming you are here because you are interested in getting a good ww2 aircraft simulator)
I will test it when I get home but in reading the patch notes I don't see anything about radio commands, AI, campaign fixes or anything else that helps us strictly offline players....you know, about 50% of the customers that bought COD. Unless these things were addressed and not put in the patch notes, I have no reason to be optimistic since the game ran pretty smooth on my system before.
  #4  
Old 09-28-2012, 06:29 PM
zapatista's Avatar
zapatista zapatista is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,172
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Force10 View Post
I will test it when I get home but in reading the patch notes I don't see anything about radio commands, AI, campaign fixes or anything else that helps us strictly offline players....you know, about 50% of the customers that bought COD. Unless these things were addressed and not put in the patch notes, I have no reason to be optimistic since the game ran pretty smooth on my system before.
i already see several positives, they did further work on the allied FM errors (with specific reference t the data provided by sean), and mention netcode improvements

personally i am hoping they also addressed the reversed controls and some of the gauge errors

if you cant see that complaining before its even tested to see whats fixed is somewhat irrational and defeatist, there isnt really anything more to say to you
__________________
President Dwight D. Eisenhower 1953: Every gun that is made, every warship launched, every rocket fired signifies, in the final sense, a theft from those who hunger and are not fed, those who are cold and are not clothed. This world in arms is not spending money alone, it is spending the sweat of its laborers, the genius of its scientists, the hopes of its children
  #5  
Old 09-28-2012, 06:30 PM
ACE-OF-ACES's Avatar
ACE-OF-ACES ACE-OF-ACES is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: NM
Posts: 2,248
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by zapatista View Post
personally i am hoping they also addressed the reversed controls and some of the gauge errors
Actully I think they did! Luither talked about fixing the Spit Hurri throttle vs mixture thingie
__________________
Theres a reason for instrumenting a plane for test..
That being a pilots's 'perception' of what is going on can be very different from what is 'actually' going on.
  #6  
Old 09-28-2012, 06:36 PM
Force10 Force10 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 371
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by zapatista View Post
i already see several positives, they did further work on the allied FM errors (with specific reference t the data provided by sean), and mention netcode improvements

personally i am hoping they also addressed the reversed controls and some of the gauge errors

if you cant see that complaining before its even tested to see whats fixed is somewhat irrational and defeatist, there isnt really anything more to say to you

Cripes...I said offline fixes. I will be happy for the online airquake guys if their issues get resolved but COD will still be a coaster until the offline stuff is fixed for offline folks.
  #7  
Old 09-28-2012, 06:37 PM
ACE-OF-ACES's Avatar
ACE-OF-ACES ACE-OF-ACES is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: NM
Posts: 2,248
Default

now if only 'some' of the offline types had an offline forum!
__________________
Theres a reason for instrumenting a plane for test..
That being a pilots's 'perception' of what is going on can be very different from what is 'actually' going on.
  #8  
Old 09-28-2012, 06:43 PM
Force10 Force10 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 371
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ACE-OF-ACES View Post
now if only 'some' of the offline types had an offline forum!
It's a shame that members are perfectly happy that half of the customer base is ignored especially when Oleg openly stated that the majority of his sales comes from offline play. I thought you wanted COD to survive? If all the offline people that bought COD didn't buy the next sequel, COD will be dead in the water.
  #9  
Old 09-28-2012, 06:45 PM
ACE-OF-ACES's Avatar
ACE-OF-ACES ACE-OF-ACES is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: NM
Posts: 2,248
Default

Tell me the one again about Luither only poking his head into this forum once every six months and how that is proof of 'poor customer relations'

All the while ignoring the fact that Luither hired BS to pass along his comments to the community..

And how that is not misleading the viewers of this forum just to keep your agenda alive..

Toooo Funny!
__________________
Theres a reason for instrumenting a plane for test..
That being a pilots's 'perception' of what is going on can be very different from what is 'actually' going on.
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:38 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.