![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Sant Claus (TM) is a Trade Mark by The Coca-Cola Co. (All Rights Reserved). Santa's Flying Sleigh (TM) is property of the NG Corporation and can't be modelled either.
__________________
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
![]() Everyone knows Santa flys a Curtiss.
__________________
![]() Personally speaking, the P-40 could contend on an equal footing with all the types of Messerschmitts, almost to the end of 1943. ~Nikolay Gerasimovitch Golodnikov |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
And according to Raaaid, he's asking for "hos" there...
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Wrong! He's actually flying a Bell...Your picture was only taken for propaganda purpose...
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v5...olor_Santa.jpg Probably because it is more convenient for him to have all the "special gifts" fitted in the nose? haha Grabbing a bottle is also easier this way...isn't it? Last edited by RegRag1977; 09-20-2012 at 09:47 AM. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Question: were all lend-lease Kobras fitted with the Russian reticle? Was it possible to keep the N9 gunsight and replace the reticle only (what we seem to have ingame)? I'm asking because now in stock game it appears the Russian reticle is too big to fit in the US gunsight and we can't use it correctly because we only have the small center part of it to use.... when it is well known that those big 37mm "pumpkins" need a hell of deflection haha.
My guess is that if Russian changed the US reticle the would also replace the gunsight in order to be able to use it completely? We cannot see the inner circle completely as is (not to talk about the outer circle): and because of that we don't have a complete reticle in the Airacobra! |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
well, i think it's right, no reasons for change here, especially, if not all soviet aircrafts have good reticle before 1943 (sometimes, only VV-1, or something like this)... but it's not so important, how you know - be better, if DT replace armor plate on armor glass (полевая доработка for some late p-39, and maybe it's later in production too), and give to us new ammo loads like "without wing mg's" (полевая доработка, + to perfomance, like PF changes for US p-39) and some new bombs (not only heavy fab-250)... maybe, how i heard, need correct fuel load (error with 454 kg fuel and weight=another perfomance), sometimes need correct weapon and ammo loads for MG's... well, not so much, and this of course mainly for "soviet" p-39... |
![]() |
|
|