Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover > Technical threads

Technical threads All discussions about technical issues

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-19-2012, 09:28 AM
zapatista's Avatar
zapatista zapatista is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,172
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bolox View Post
Yes the data Artist points to is what is needed- infact CoD has many more types of data that is readable than old IL2 devicelink.
I've messed about with coding based on that to do 'speedbar' type readings of various parameters but that's about my limit of coding- hacking other peoples work
One of the 'tricky bits' of coding required is to 'translate' the request packet from say udpseed into an answer packet from CoD
so what exactly do you need to be able to use the data accessed by the simhq guy, to be able to use it for your gauges ? if some limited form of data is already accessed for them to create the displayed data for heading and altitude, shouldn't it then be possible to translate that to a format that some of the gauges can use ?

btw, isnt it also possible to have some very limited 3D version of the gauges so it avoids the 3D/2D problem you mentioned before ? with most gfx cards having multiple connectors these days and the minimal GPU resources needed to display a 2 color static image i would have hoped we dont need to run a 2e pc to just display the 2e screen with the UDP method. err, please be aware i know nothing of programing, so i am probably overlooking some obvious reasons why some of this is an issue
__________________
President Dwight D. Eisenhower 1953: Every gun that is made, every warship launched, every rocket fired signifies, in the final sense, a theft from those who hunger and are not fed, those who are cold and are not clothed. This world in arms is not spending money alone, it is spending the sweat of its laborers, the genius of its scientists, the hopes of its children

Last edited by zapatista; 09-19-2012 at 09:41 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-19-2012, 11:16 AM
bolox bolox is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 351
Default

Quote:
so what exactly do you need to be able to use the data accessed by the simhq guy, to be able to use it for your gauges ?
The easiest way would be for CoD to output 'old style devicelink' outputs.

This would entail the CoD script doing:
1) reading the request packet sent from udpspeed,
This bit would probably need to read from an ini file to set up the IP address and port
2)ordering the data from this packet into an array or similar.
This could be simplified/eliminated IF the contents of the packet is a fixed, known set say for a BFP gauge set using~ 10 parameters.
A more universal system would be better tho.
3)Then each parameter must be associated with the relevant CoD parameter and read this data, There is a problem in converting units as IAS is given in km/h in Luft AC and mp/h in British AC. Doable in code but another complication Indicated ASI is also possibly nit accurate
4)write this converted data into the reply packet
5)send it

that's my take on what needs to be coded- actually doing it is beyond my talents

this is the nearest example of something similar i've found
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/tst0kwb1.aspx

http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc768
shows udp protocol

devicelink doesn't use checksums

Quote:
btw, isnt it possible to have some very limited 3D version of the gauges so it avoids the 3D/2D problem you mentioned before ? with most gfx cards having multiple connectors these days and the minimal GPU resources needed to display a 2 color static image i would have hoped we dont need to run a 2e pc to just display the 2e screen with the UDP method
anything is possible An MG produced program that displayed the 'wondewoman' gauges- (editable, reposition/sizing ability, saveable profiles,...) would be nice as a free bonus in the sequel
As to wether modern cards won't affect fps i couldn't say for sure (4 yrs ago with IL2 it was definately a problem)
http://forums.ubi.com/showthread.php...-thread/page30
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-20-2012, 05:03 AM
Skiiwa Skiiwa is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 88
Default

I for one, Support this Thread!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-21-2012, 09:59 PM
Friendly_flyer's Avatar
Friendly_flyer Friendly_flyer is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Oslo, Norway
Posts: 412
Default

I hope the devs gives this a mind. With the complexity of the engine, this would likely help reach another niche of the market too.

Please, do go on, Gents!
__________________
Fly friendly!



Visit No 79 Squadron vRAF

Petter Bøckman
Norway
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-04-2012, 04:26 AM
bolox bolox is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 351
Default

a beacon of hope from Russia perhaps?

Quote:
Brief: The program allows you to view additional monitor or computer \ netbook \ Tablet PC on the LAN instrument panel plane.

In general, then, could not sleep.

Spread the beta testing.

Included so far only one, simple skin ULTRA LIGHT with schematic devices, check how to behave Gadgets . Photorealistic'll post later.

The program runs until only a single mission, with the start of the air.
http://translate.googleusercontent.c...aEJ_xYjlYRzI1w
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 01:54 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.