British FM killing the fun of the game for allied pilots.

[Crumpp]

The second part, he never suggested that, we want 2 models which are reasonably representative of each

I agree the game should reasonably represent the airplanes.

Now, it is reasonable representation of the airplanes if one plane has a much better relative dogfighting capability than it had in reality to the others?

I don't think so....

[Crumpp]

He must've deleted his post

I just combined the post to answer two people.

[Robo.]

Originally Posted by Ze-Jamz

The Devas have a wealth of info in regards to these FM's and have accumulated this over many years....I suggest they release what they see as proper operating instructions for these aircraft, what have they wrote into the FM that they see as proper operation, that would be interesting to see

No, unfortunately, most of the in-depth information is coming from the community, in many cases just very recently, and there are quite trivial things the devs had no clue about... They are listening and they ara also seriously trying to rectify these issues - and the FMs are still WIP, which is OK, but the errors and problems are there for quite different reasons that the ones you are listing I am afraid. In other words - if I should bet any money on if the cock up is a bug or feature, it would be a bug more likely than not.

[swift]

So, do we know if the current overheating issue with all spit versions is a bug or incorrect FM? I really would like to know as I really struggle with these birds.

[TomcatViP]

It's a feature

[Robo.]

Originally Posted by Crumpp

Ok, so what you guys want is an airplane that is as fast as the Spitfire, climbs as well as the Spitfire, turns as well as the Spitfire, but acts like the Hurricane?

In otherwords a frankenplane that never existed during the Battle of Britain?

I don't see where that is any more realistic than the FM's in the game now you are all complaining about.

What are you talking about here?

[CaptainDoggles]

Originally Posted by Osprey

You misunderstand the term frankenplane btw. It was coined from the practice of producing a particular type by using model files from pieces of another type which are similar enough. The FM was never pieced together like that, they are new files.

That might be your particular definition but I think everyone knows what he meant by "frankenplane."

I'll be back; I have to go pick up more Pedantic from the grocery store

[5./JG27.Farber]

You would think the devs would have an entire library of stuff from the last title. However I suppose even if you did you would have to sit down and read an entire library

[TomcatViP]

Originally Posted by 5./JG27.Farber

You would think the devs would have an entire library of stuff from the last title. However I suppose even if you did you would have to sit down and read an entire library

Where ? From SpitPerfsdotcom ? lol. Printed this makes only good sponges for the flood. Not much more

@CaptainDoggles : I've got plenty of second-hands to resale!

[bongodriver]

Originally Posted by Crumpp

Please provide a link to what you think I said. Don't do it in this thread. You can just PM me. In all probability, you are confused and we can leave it out of this thread. If you are right, I will be glad to post it in another thread.

You and I know exactly what you said, it seems it is you who are confused if you don't recall the 94 page thread you started discussing this very issue.

Heres the link that you asked for.....very odd you need reminding.

http://forum.1cpublishing.eu/showthread.php?t=33245

Now can you please explain how stick force per G is nothing to do with stability and control without going against everything you contributed to that thread?