4.09?

[Sovien]

Originally Posted by The_one

no sovien , it looks like the post that started this off by where Feuerfalke addressed me as being simple has been removed. it was not in reference to where your link goes, but it was a direct attack on my personality by directly calling me "simple",
as for the rest of your quotes, this just goes to prove that you are the type of person that likes to keep trouble going. maybe you have been reported for this very reason?????????
ever heard the expression let sleeping dogs lye ?
if it was such an issue to Feuerfalke, then it would be him making all the quotes, and as it was left by himself and me then it would have suggested that any issues where sorted. pm's are a wonderfull thing you know.
but you seem to want to keep it going, and keep something going that has absolutely NOTHING to do with you.
get of your horse and drink ur milk mate. and keep out of things that have nothing to do with you eh.

First, this is a public forum and as such all members can freely reply to any post...yes, even the one's that have nothing to do with them. In other words, I don't need your permission or blessing to do so. If you dont want any Joe Shmoe replying to your posts then don't post on a public forum.

Second, if pm's are such a wonderful thing to you then you should have kept this debate to the pm's instead of replying to my post. If you chose to post a reply to mine, you should expect the same in turn. Your pride was hurt and you wanted to make an attempt to save face - so you posted instead of keeping it to the pm's. So why should you expect any different?

Third, in response to the one point you offered a rebuttal on (The "Simple" conspiracy): The quote and the link speak for themselves. You are wrong. You want it to be Feuer called you "simple" because your reaching and reaching for something to attack him over. Simple understanding of the English language provides clear indication this was not the intent (as in this case, "simple understanding" was also not used as an adjective to describe you as a person).

Fourth, I honestly could careless if Feuer is offended - Feuer can defend himself. I didn't post to "come to his aid". I thought your post lacked tact. Lacked so much tact I felt it was worth addressing.

Fifth, as far as milk is concerned, as long as it has a healthy dose of chocolate mixed in I will be more then happy to drink it.

In closing, all of my previous points still stand. If you'd like to continue this discussion in pm's I'd be more then happy to do so. As matter of fact, I replied to the pm you sent me (after posting your first reply to my first post), but you have failed to keep this debate in the pm's. I really thought that's were they would stay, but now I'm really not surprised in the least that you just couldn't resist replying in the thread. I sincerely hope you enjoyed another spoonful of Hypocracy.

I await your response in my pm's (you still have yet to reply to my initial reply to your first and only pm to me).

Peace-out. Homie.