Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik > Daidalos Team discussions

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-06-2012, 06:52 PM
RegRag1977 RegRag1977 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 139
Default We definitely need new dgen campaigns

We definitely need new dgen campaigns. I wonder if there is a TD plan to improve DGEN and to create some new ones? That would be nice...
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-06-2012, 11:48 PM
Sillius_Sodus Sillius_Sodus is offline
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 3
Default

My apologies if this has already been requested but I feel it would be nice if we could specify the number of passes an ai aircraft would make over a ground attack target, i.e. an airfield.

This could also be useful for ai attacks on bombers, then you could program them to do 'hit and run' attacks.

Thanks again for all your good work TD!

Last edited by Sillius_Sodus; 08-07-2012 at 03:47 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-07-2012, 01:57 AM
Ace1staller Ace1staller is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: somewhere in the united states
Posts: 125
Smile

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sillius_Sodus View Post
My apologies if this has already been requested but I feel it would be nice if we could specify the number of passes an ai aircraft would make over a ground attack target, i.e. and airfield.

This could also be useful for ai attacks on bombers, then you could program them to do 'hit and run' attacks.

Thanks again for all your good work TD!
good one +1 (:
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-07-2012, 03:54 AM
IceFire IceFire is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,879
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sillius_Sodus View Post
My apologies if this has already been requested but I feel it would be nice if we could specify the number of passes an ai aircraft would make over a ground attack target, i.e. and airfield.

This could also be useful for ai attacks on bombers, then you could program them to do 'hit and run' attacks.

Thanks again for all your good work TD!
A great suggestion for the Custom Waypoint settings... we already have some specific settings for takeoff and attack profile would be very useful.

The number of passes but also the type of attack (i.e. dive bombing, level bombing, strafe/wheel of death, etc.).
__________________
Find my missions and much more at Mission4Today.com
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-07-2012, 12:25 PM
Sapper Sapper is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 12
Default

AB250 and SD250 loadouts for the me262A2. Their usual loadout against allied ground forces in the ETO.

Last edited by Sapper; 08-17-2012 at 09:41 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-07-2012, 09:34 PM
Woke Up Dead Woke Up Dead is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 209
Default Forward looking only F6

Have an option for a limited F6 (external lock) function, one that will lock on to enemies only in the front of the player's wing-line, or maybe only the front 270 degrees. This will allow bandits to sneak in on the player's six, while the player can still track the planes in front of him that he likely saw already.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-08-2012, 03:31 AM
Pursuivant Pursuivant is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 1,439
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Woke Up Dead View Post
Have an option for a limited F6 (external lock) function, one that will lock on to enemies only in the front of the player's wing-line, or maybe only the front 270 degrees. This will allow bandits to sneak in on the player's six, while the player can still track the planes in front of him that he likely saw already.
+1

This would be very useful.

It would also be useful if there was the option for your point of view to immediately snap back to forward view (or whatever) as soon as padlocked targets are no longer visible.

I've nearly had heart attacks when I've been making attack run against a padlocked ground target and my point of view follows the target as it passes under my wings and behind me, when I really want my point of view to be forward as I pull out of my dive and maneuver to avoid flak.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-10-2012, 09:26 AM
JimmyBlonde JimmyBlonde is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 161
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RegRag1977 View Post
We definitely need new dgen campaigns. I wonder if there is a TD plan to improve DGEN and to create some new ones? That would be nice...
It's good to see people still calling for more Dgen campaigns. A general Dgen revamp would be priceless.

I've been playing with Asura's Dgen mod lately and it rocks, much better than stock. The beauty of it is that I can add mod planes to the campaigns I already have and Asura is busy adding more maps for the next version.

From experimenting myself I have learned that creating Dgen campaigns is a very time-consuming and tedious process. It's understandable that not many people are willing to put in the effort that it takes to complete them.

I would love to see full use made of the new aircraft (And the old ones that have never had been available in Dgen) and features (Beacons, new loadouts, etc) as a part of official updates. It always puzzled me why this never happened when 1C was releasing things like the Aces Expansion Pack, and the Pe-2 stuff. After Pacific Fighters they just dumped new planes in the game, maybe with a static campaign, and then left it up to the player to make stuff which is far beyond what most people are capable of or just not prepared to do.

Some kind of user configurable UI tool for Dgen like DCG with pre-made maps and all aircraft/features available would be an awesome addition because quick missions, single missions and linear campaigns just don't cut it for me. It would be a huge effort to get all of that completed but the demand is there for it and I think there are a fair few people who would put in their time to make it happen. (I know I would).
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 08-10-2012, 11:00 AM
csThor csThor is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: somewhere in Germany
Posts: 1,213
Default

The reason why the old DGen is static and grossly outdated is that it was never a Maddox Games program but an external one. And said developer disappeared years ago, taking the source code with him. As such there is simply no way to work with the old DGen anymore, at least not without jumping through too many hoops to justify the effort. This is also why Asura is writing a new DGen, the old one didn't offer enough flexibility and possibilities, not to mention that adding planes and maps was a chore.

Expecting TD to do any DGen work is therefor simply unrealistic. Support for Asura, yes that's being done, but anything beyond is simply not possible.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 08-11-2012, 01:54 AM
Ace1staller Ace1staller is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: somewhere in the united states
Posts: 125
Default

I feel we lack french tanks in the game, I think i said it once and I'm saying it again, we lack the French tanks and ground units. For example the Char B1 tank is a french tank in WWII and it was also used by the Germans.

I wish you can pick a tank then choose the country its used by so it won't be so confusing
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:17 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.