Another pointless poll...

[bongodriver]

I think we should start a poll asking wether people think this poll was pointless or not

[ACE-OF-ACES]

Originally Posted by Buchon

Yeah ... whatever ...

You sound upset? If so..

Are you upset with..

1) yourself for being wrong when you said 777 does not offer a box set to buy.
2) me for pointing out you were wrong to say that 777 does not offer a box set to buy.
3) me for not agreeing with your point of view (read opinion) that RoF is not sucessful

Originally Posted by Buchon

I wonder if there one of those RoF boxes for 250$ in my market place

Why are you interested? If so, I would recomend you start with the $39 box only buy the DLC your interested in.

[zapatista]

Originally Posted by furbs

As i said, all bloody pointless.

ahh but you could have been a contender !! (/que marlon brando voice)

all you had to do is find a worth while comparison, instead of believing that all that glitters is gold and choosing "anything with airplanes in it"

unless the entertaining banter around here is focused on producing something more positive as an outcome (eg not undermine further development and make it thereby less likely we get a working product we all enjoy for years to come), the lot of you might as well all go home and instead throw your empty soda cans at the tellee when you dont like what the little talking people in the box say

[furbs]

Zap, i always enjoy your posts. Cheers!

[carguy_]

Originally Posted by zapatista

wrong

their paid beta program is also a success, and would have avoided the storm of -ve publicity CoD generated on release (and something people like tree-uk never had the IQ power to comprehend), it was either the broken beta we got (and yes, was sold to us as a completed game, and that was the mistake) or NOTHING. having, and tolerating still, the perpetual clique of selfish whiners hasnt created ANYTHING positive to improve the outcome, if anything it has worsened our problem.

+2

[[URU]AkeR]

Why do you keep comparing with ROF. I played the game for 1 week and never touched it again. Yes it performs better than COD. But the "feel" didnt seem right. I prefer COD with graphics to medium and low, and no trees, but with a better feel of flight and air combat.

COD platform will keep improving, removing its flaws, and eventually I will be able to buy better hardware. But ROF should be done all over again to change how it feels.

Dont get me wrong it is a beautifull game, and probably use it if i had more time, but right now most of my time goes to IL21946, and the rest to COD

[von Pilsner]

Originally Posted by [URU]AkeR

Why do you keep comparing with ROF. I played the game for 1 week and never touched it again.

Agreed, the RoF engine can not handle many ground objects, it would not be better for CloD to use that old DX9 engine.

[SharpeXB]

That's where CoD probably went wrong. If you look at many other sims, RoF, DCS and even Ms Flight (not a sim) What you buy are the planes, not really the game itself.
I pretty much donate all I have to 777 and buy every plane and mod just because they do such a great job.
DCS P-51 and A-10C. Yes, I'll pay $49.00 for a sim that really works even with only one plane, one that's done really well.
If CoD or BoM was structured that way I'd buy it too.
There's really no way I can imagine how they can expect to sell a single game for one price with all these detailed aircraft and maps and so on.