Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover

IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games.

View Poll Results: Pay £100 for a fixed COD (ROF style)
Yes! 58 50.00%
No way! 58 50.00%
Voters: 116. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-15-2012, 08:19 AM
furbs's Avatar
furbs furbs is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,039
Default Another pointless poll...

If i could turn back time...

(Que movie dreamlike wavy screen with music)

...and change COD's development style to ROF's, in which we had to pay more often for planes and extras, but guaranteed COD would be working as well as ROF is now with everything fixed, bug free, clouds, trees, weather, sound, extra planes, net code and campaigns ...everything.

Would you have gladly payed...lets say... £100?
__________________
Furbs, Tree and Falstaff...The COD killers...

Last edited by furbs; 07-15-2012 at 08:24 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-15-2012, 03:07 PM
Pudfark Pudfark is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Republic of Texas
Posts: 363
Default

I would have paid more than that for a more "workable" sim at release.
As it turned out?
I spent about $1500.00 for what we have now.

Some where in the above, is the solution in/for the future.
Maybe?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-15-2012, 03:14 PM
ParaB ParaB is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Germany
Posts: 205
Default

I'd have gladly paid double the price for a working CloD on release. I've bought Steel Beasts Pro PE for 125$ and still consider it a fine investment. Same for all the content I bought for RoF or the DCS series.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-15-2012, 03:29 PM
jayrc's Avatar
jayrc jayrc is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 339
Default

I don't like this style of pay to play, nothings worse than sitting on a server trying to play the game and having to buy a plane just to play, then never seeing that plane come up again, I'd rather pay more money up front and have everything
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-15-2012, 03:33 PM
raaaid's Avatar
raaaid raaaid is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,329
Default

reality changes all the time by time travellers

curiously my dreams on time travel and reality change fit those in mib3 and the ened of eternity by asimov

theres a time line where the ubizoo got broken and all that community migrated here wchich brought such a good mood to the forum and nice comunity that the modders helped luthier bring up the perfect game

also that time line is so nice they discover water is slightly poisonous so drinking alcoholics beverages is the only drink as cheap as water

in that time line you open the water tap at home and it comes out beer

but well it couldnt be in that timeline a neurobiologist test a chip -brain interface in atetraplegic which finally decodes the language of the brain

so sorry guys is btter to not have a working game that humanity devolving and eventually stinguishing all due to the fast rewards of trnahumanism

edit:

so my answers is yes i would pay again even double for it i regret nothing in my past choices
__________________
http://i40.photobucket.com/albums/e222/raaaid/fmkld-1.jpg2.4ghz dual core cpu
3gb ram
ASUS Radeon EAH4650 DI - 1 GB GDDR2

I PREFER TO LOVE WITHOUT BEING LOVED THAT NOT LOVE AT ALL

Last edited by raaaid; 07-15-2012 at 04:02 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-15-2012, 04:08 PM
ACE-OF-ACES's Avatar
ACE-OF-ACES ACE-OF-ACES is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: NM
Posts: 2,248
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by furbs View Post
...and change COD's development style to ROF's, in which we had to pay more often for planes and extras,
I think that would be a smart move.. It is the future of games that are not as popular (sales) as other games, and flight sims falls into that catagory.

Quote:
Originally Posted by furbs View Post
but guaranteed COD would be working as well as ROF is now with everything fixed, bug free, clouds, trees, weather, sound, extra planes, net code and campaigns ...everything.
So let me see if I understand you correctly..

When you say 'working as well as RoF' your saying less bugs is aceptable?

If so glad to hear you admit it!

Because truth be told RoF is NOT without issues!

The current RoF versions has a few nasty bugs in it, the most noticeable one being the sound bug, where it forces you to leave the online server and restart the software.

Quote:
Originally Posted by furbs View Post
Would you have gladly payed...lets say... £100?
I have allready spent more than that on RoF and I don't regret one penny of it! RoF is a great sim and alot of fun.. But as noted above it is not perfect! When you take into account that RoF has been out (released) a good year before CoD and what with the 777 buy out, they have had more 'time' and 'money' to fix the bugs in RoF..

Yet they have not fixxed them all! Something the peeps in this forum should take note of the next time they compare RoF to CoD.

That is to say check back in a year and after a CoD sequal and see which flight sim you like better!
__________________
Theres a reason for instrumenting a plane for test..
That being a pilots's 'perception' of what is going on can be very different from what is 'actually' going on.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-15-2012, 04:42 PM
CWMV's Avatar
CWMV CWMV is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 758
Default

Truth is the RoF model works.
Is like to see maybe plane packs, say 109E-1 to E-7 rather than each plane individually, but hell anything is better than what we have now.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by banned View Post
Just fix the friggin thing you boof heads. It's getting boring now. Only 11 people on the whole thing. Yawn.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 07-15-2012, 04:51 PM
Jaws2002 Jaws2002 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 851
Default

I think the problem was how funds were alocated rather than how much funding the game got.
I think they spent way too much money and time for things they didn't need at release and then end up with not enough money to pay the most important guys in the team, what they deserved (or wanted).
From my understanding some of the lead programers left or were fired from the team for financial reasons, less then a year from the release.

Really bad move.
__________________
----------------------------------------
Asus Sabertooth Z77
i7 3770k@4.3GHz+ Noctua NH D14 cooler
EVGA GTX 780 Superclocked+ACX cooler.
8GB G.Skill ripjaws DDR3-1600
Crucial M4 128GB SSD+Crucial M4 256GB SSD
Seagate 750GB HDD
CH Fighterstick+CH Pro pedals+Saitek X45
Win7 64bit
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 07-15-2012, 05:01 PM
ElAurens's Avatar
ElAurens ElAurens is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: The Great Black Swamp of Ohio
Posts: 2,185
Default

*YAWN*

Pointless indeed.
__________________


Personally speaking, the P-40 could contend on an equal footing with all the types of Messerschmitts, almost to the end of 1943.
~Nikolay Gerasimovitch Golodnikov
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 07-15-2012, 05:01 PM
raaaid's Avatar
raaaid raaaid is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,329
Default

hey you overlooked my idea:

how about making clod open source as il246 and let a bunch of modders work on it to fix it
__________________
http://i40.photobucket.com/albums/e222/raaaid/fmkld-1.jpg2.4ghz dual core cpu
3gb ram
ASUS Radeon EAH4650 DI - 1 GB GDDR2

I PREFER TO LOVE WITHOUT BEING LOVED THAT NOT LOVE AT ALL
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:39 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.