Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover > Technical threads > FM/DM threads

FM/DM threads Everything about FM/DM in CoD

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old 07-11-2012, 08:00 PM
Al Schlageter Al Schlageter is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 657
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flanker35M View Post
S!

Well, Bf110C with DB601N engines/C3 and Bf109E-4/N using C3 are not modelled in game at the moment but no-one is complaining Bf110C with 100oct would be easily faster than Hurricane and faster than Spit at some altitudes, but still no-one is whining for them, even they existed Will be added if devs deem it OK based on data supplied to them. No need to make a drama out of it at all.
You haven't seen Kurfurst's sig have you?

Bring them on as long as it isn't a sky full them and no other 110s and/or 109s.
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 07-11-2012, 08:09 PM
fruitbat's Avatar
fruitbat fruitbat is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: S E England
Posts: 1,065
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TomcatViP View Post
I did date Jenny Lopez... I did date Jenny Lopez... I did date Jenny Lopez... I did date Jenny Lopez...
wow, what a riposte.

you have totally changed my mind with that stunning evidence.

carry on in your dream world.
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 07-11-2012, 08:12 PM
Seadog Seadog is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 226
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TomcatViP View Post
I did date Jenny Lopez... I did date Jenny Lopez... I did date Jenny Lopez... I did date Jenny Lopez...
I'm sure that you believe that.
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 07-11-2012, 09:22 PM
TomcatViP TomcatViP is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,323
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Seadog View Post
I'm sure that you believe that.
Just as you do.
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 07-12-2012, 01:59 AM
Crumpp's Avatar
Crumpp Crumpp is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,552
Default

Quote:
you have totally changed my mind with that stunning evidence.
What he is saying it is no different than you taking evidence and reading only what you want to see.

The BoB was a transition period and the extent of use depends on the date you pick for the battle to end.

I don't understand the obsession anyway. It was summertime during the battle and the envelope for high manifold pressure/high rpm is greatly reduced. In fact, it will result in poorer performance than a lower manifold pressure/rpm under such conditions.

I believe the evidence was presented that 100 Octane made less of a difference in the battle than CSP's.

Look at the paper performance on a standard day, it is quite an improvement. Why do you think that was not so stunning an improvement in the air?

High density altitude conditions of summer is why!!
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 07-12-2012, 08:12 AM
Glider Glider is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 441
Default

So are you now trying to blame the performance increase on the English weather?
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 07-12-2012, 10:10 AM
NZtyphoon NZtyphoon is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: NZ
Posts: 543
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Crumpp View Post
What he is saying it is no different than you taking evidence and reading only what you want to see.
Which is what Crumpp does all the time.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Crumpp View Post
The BoB was a transition period and the extent of use depends on the date you pick for the battle to end.
Yep, the B of B was a transition from all frontline fighter units of FC using 100 Octane fuel to all Commands using 100 octane, and when the Battle ended, 31 October or May 1941, is immaterial.
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 07-12-2012, 12:28 PM
Crumpp's Avatar
Crumpp Crumpp is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,552
Default

Quote:
So are you now trying to blame the performance increase on the English weather?
You claim to be a pilot but do not understand the differences in summer and winter performance?

Density altitude effects?

http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j...rCDcByVdDIdgPg
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 07-12-2012, 02:45 PM
Glider Glider is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 441
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Crumpp View Post
You claim to be a pilot but do not understand the differences in summer and winter performance?

Density altitude effects?

http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j...rCDcByVdDIdgPg
If you had experienced an english summer you would know what I am talking about.
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 07-12-2012, 04:29 PM
Igo kyu's Avatar
Igo kyu Igo kyu is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 703
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Glider View Post
If you had experienced an english summer you would know what I am talking about.
They are variable, you need to experience five or six to begin to get a feeling. This one is wet so far, but there are some months yet to go. I think it was 1978 that was hot and dry. They are all different.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:11 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.