Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover > Technical threads > FM/DM threads

FM/DM threads Everything about FM/DM in CoD

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-09-2012, 04:31 PM
Crumpp's Avatar
Crumpp Crumpp is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,552
Default

Quote:
When was that admitted that the Merlin delivered 12lb boost in 1940 ?
When was it approved for sustained climbs?????
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-09-2012, 04:51 PM
5./JG27.Farber 5./JG27.Farber is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,958
Default

Please explain the chart building and how to do this. I would not mind doing this for the 109, cheers.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-10-2012, 07:53 AM
klem's Avatar
klem klem is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,653
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 5./JG27.Farber View Post
Please explain the chart building and how to do this. I would not mind doing this for the 109, cheers.
Farber, there is an explanation in the .doc file in the zip file in my OP. Its basically chart building from the output data using Excel or OpenOffice. Let me know if there's anything that isn't clear or needs expanding.

EDIT: I just updated my OP as I saw I had not attached the zip file and then I replaced it with a few corrections to the instructions.
__________________
klem
56 Squadron RAF "Firebirds"
http://firebirds.2ndtaf.org.uk/



ASUS Sabertooth X58 /i7 950 @ 4GHz / 6Gb DDR3 1600 CAS8 / EVGA GTX570 GPU 1.28Gb superclocked / Crucial 128Gb SSD SATA III 6Gb/s, 355Mb-215Mb Read-Write / 850W PSU
Windows 7 64 bit Home Premium / Samsung 22" 226BW @ 1680 x 1050 / TrackIR4 with TrackIR5 software / Saitek X52 Pro & Rudders

Last edited by klem; 07-10-2012 at 09:22 AM. Reason: OP zip file added and revised
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-10-2012, 08:11 AM
gimpy117 gimpy117 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 47
Default

I would also like to see ME-109 climb and performance tests. I bet it's borked too
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-10-2012, 03:24 AM
Seadog Seadog is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 226
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Crumpp View Post
When was it approved for sustained climbs?????
It was approved for 5mins at 12lb boost/3000rpm in 1940, and it was up to the pilots on how and when to use the power; including sustained climbs:



and:

Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-10-2012, 05:04 AM
Al Schlageter Al Schlageter is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 657
Default

But Seadog, Crumpp says the Pilot's handbook says nothing about 12lb boost.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-10-2012, 09:28 AM
Bounder! Bounder! is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 129
Default

Thanks for posting Klem
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 07-11-2012, 12:40 PM
klem's Avatar
klem klem is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,653
Default Hurricane MkI 87 octane vs 100 octane

Just did a quick comparison of Hurricane Mk I 87 Octane vs 100 octane at 1000, 5000 and 10000 feet.

Seems the old 87 octane is faster than the 100 octane

Would appreciate it if anyone else would like to check that.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg HurricaneMkI_87oct_LevelSpeed_1.07.18301.jpg (214.1 KB, 19 views)
__________________
klem
56 Squadron RAF "Firebirds"
http://firebirds.2ndtaf.org.uk/



ASUS Sabertooth X58 /i7 950 @ 4GHz / 6Gb DDR3 1600 CAS8 / EVGA GTX570 GPU 1.28Gb superclocked / Crucial 128Gb SSD SATA III 6Gb/s, 355Mb-215Mb Read-Write / 850W PSU
Windows 7 64 bit Home Premium / Samsung 22" 226BW @ 1680 x 1050 / TrackIR4 with TrackIR5 software / Saitek X52 Pro & Rudders
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 07-11-2012, 02:23 PM
=AN=Felipe =AN=Felipe is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 26
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by klem View Post
Just did a quick comparison of Hurricane Mk I 87 Octane vs 100 octane at 1000, 5000 and 10000 feet.

Seems the old 87 octane is faster than the 100 octane

Would appreciate it if anyone else would like to check that.
We will test all them again =) its no problem ok?

cya
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 07-11-2012, 02:40 PM
Igo kyu's Avatar
Igo kyu Igo kyu is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 703
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by klem View Post
Just did a quick comparison of Hurricane Mk I 87 Octane vs 100 octane at 1000, 5000 and 10000 feet.

Seems the old 87 octane is faster than the 100 octane
Your figures are without boost. The difference was AIUI (which may or may not be correct ) that 100 octane allowed more boost at low level. So figures without boost shouldn't show a difference, and with boost only up to FTH.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:56 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.