![]() |
|
IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games. |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Didn't the E7 had the DB601N engine?
__________________
Win 7/64 Ult.; Phenom II X6 1100T; ASUS Crosshair IV; 16 GB DDR3/1600 Corsair; ASUS EAH6950/2GB; Logitech G940 & the usual suspects ![]() |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
No it had the same DB 601 A as the previous Emils. The only Emils who got the DB 601N received the /N suffix to their designation.
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Hi. The DB 601/N wasn't the dafault engine of the E-7, but – of course – it was used in E-7/N and E-4/N too.
__________________
![]() ![]() i7 7700K 4.8GHz, 32GB Ram 3GHz, MSI GTX 1070 8GB, 27' 1920x1080, W10/64, TrackIR 4Pro, G940 Cliffs of Dover Bugtracker site: share and vote issues here |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Is a shame how the devs shows such lack of respect to the community who tested (and continue testing) the buggy beta patch and, one week later, they have nothing to tell us about all the bugs that we report. Not even a message saying that they took note about the bugs that we reported or something like that ....
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
This community for shure hasn't earned any respect in view of the very outspoken comments here regarding MG or 1c. It seems the misconception, that harsh words will gain goodwill, is still far spread.
__________________
Win 7/64 Ult.; Phenom II X6 1100T; ASUS Crosshair IV; 16 GB DDR3/1600 Corsair; ASUS EAH6950/2GB; Logitech G940 & the usual suspects ![]() |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
live with it |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
+1
__________________
Theres a reason for instrumenting a plane for test..
That being a pilots's 'perception' of what is going on can be very different from what is 'actually' going on. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The comments of the community are only the consecuences of the continues promises broken. Nevertheless, you are mistaken in thinking that 1c and mg are in the same situation as us, the consumers. We pay for a product which they promised to deliver but clearly they not accomplished.
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
I expect that all the Devs has been banned from posting on this forum (except for Black Six and his official statements are very guarded). No amount of provocative posts will elicite a responce. They are just annoying to the rest of the community. My only gripe is that COD has made the original IL2 unplayable for me - which is sad because I really thought it was great in it's time. "Onward and Upward" as they say! Cheers! Last edited by Skoshi Tiger; 07-07-2012 at 11:53 PM. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Don't you think respect is a two way street? You have to give it to get it. We all know the devs had to release the product early and didn't inform their customers of what was missing....bad start. Their communications have been vague at best ever since. I think somehow we would survive if COD didn't pan out. On the other hand, they need our respect because they need us to be happy customers that spend more money on their next products.
Without our cash, they will be out of work with "programmer for COD" on their resume' in a tough job market. Technically they need us more than the reverse IMO. |
![]() |
|
|