Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover > Technical threads > FM/DM threads

FM/DM threads Everything about FM/DM in CoD

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-04-2012, 05:58 PM
Kwiatek's Avatar
Kwiatek Kwiatek is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 367
Default

Still some here try to put these disccusion into red or blue agenda whining lol. Poor anyside biased people.

The true is that actuall engine power modeling is wrong in many ways. Merlin engines in CLoD dont reach their real life specification. It should be corrected.

No one from "blue guys" dont even mention that 109 E in CLoD could fly all day in 5-minutes emergency power rating - 1.3 Ata at 2400 RPM without any engine problems but when it is clearly that Merling III or Merlin XII cant even reach their 5-minutes emergency rating without broken engine and some want it to be correct "blue guys" screem like hurted kids.

Im sure that time limit for engine power settings (from manual) should be reachable without any seriously problems in normal condition of flight and only in extremaly condition ( e.x very hot temperatures, cooling system damages, engine damages) could casue a problems.

Unfortunately in CLOD even in normal condition time limits for engine power settings are not possible to achive not mention that there are many bugs with designated engine power settings like e.x. SPitfire MK II with Merlin XII - nominal power should be +9lbs at 2850 RPM ( not +6 like now) and emergency should be +12 lbs at 3000 RPMs (not +9lbs like now)

I repeat correctly (historical) engine power settings for Merlin engines:

Merlin III with CSP at 87 Octan fuel:

Max take off - +6 1/4 at 3000 RPM
Climbing (1/2 hour limit) - +6 1/4 at 2600 RPM
Continous cruising- +4 1/2 at 2600 RPM
All-out level flight (5 minutes limit) - +6 1/4 at 3000 RPM

Merlin III at 100 Octan :

Max take off - +6 1/4 at 3000 RPM
Climbing (1/2 hour)- +6 1/4 at 2850 RPM ( below 20 000 ft)
-3000 RPM (above 20 000 ft)
All-out level flight ( 5 minutes)- +6 1/4 at 3000 RPM ( 5 minutes)
Emergency power (5 minutes)- +12 lbs at 3000 RPM ( 5 minutes)


Merlin XII at 100 Octan

Max take off - +12 at 3000 RPM
(emergency 3 or 5-minutes also)
Climbing (1/2 hour limit) - +9 at 2850 RPM
Continous cruising- +7 at 2650 RPM
All-out level flight (5 minutes limit)- +9 at 3000 RPM

Last edited by Kwiatek; 07-04-2012 at 07:20 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-04-2012, 07:15 PM
Crumpp's Avatar
Crumpp Crumpp is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,552
Default

Quote:
now you can't stall the thing, you can apparently pull like a plunger and it won't stall while turning.
That is not right at all. The Spitfire gave plenty of warning but the longitudinal instability made it easy to over control and stall with a wing that had very harsh accelerated stall characteristics.

3/4 in stick travel runs the wing from cruise to stall with 5lbs per G.
Here is the post war proposal to adopt quantifiable stability and control standards like the United States. Up until then, stability and control at the RAE was opinion. It is interesting too reading the measured results vs opinion.

In Gates test, the Spitfire exhibited peak stick force during a steady 4G pullout was only TWO POUNDS!!

Of course he labeled it too light. The Stirling on the other hand exhibited a peak stick force of 84lbs during a steady 2G pull out. It was considered normal under quantifiable stability and control criteria.

Now Gates did publish several papers after visiting the NACA attempting to get the RAE on a standard or at least improve their stability and control science but it was not adopted until post war.

Between Gates and Lyons the RAE was finally on a standard by 1950.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-04-2012, 07:30 PM
Robo.'s Avatar
Robo. Robo. is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Nottingham, UK
Posts: 658
Default

What Kwiatek said.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Crumpp View Post
That is not right at all. The Spitfire gave plenty of warning but the longitudinal instability made it easy to over control and stall with a wing that had very harsh accelerated stall characteristics.
I am aware of that, Crumpp.
__________________
Bobika.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-04-2012, 08:03 PM
Flanker35M Flanker35M is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Finland
Posts: 1,806
Default

S!

Kwiatek, I do not complain about the 1.31ata as I VERY rarely even use it My most used setting is actually the best cruise power 1.21ata That way can keep oil and coolant cool with minimal radiator flap opening thus I have nice speed too

But this all boils down to the "complicated" CEM we have, basically a bit refined from IL-2. CEM is not an issue most of the time as you soon learn the settings that can be run regardless power settings. Be it blue or red.

I think all agree that the FM/DM/CEM needs a LOT of work and we can only hope that before the sequel is out, it is done or all hell will break lose and this bickering here will be nothing compared to that.

Over and out
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:11 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.