Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik > Daidalos Team discussions

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-01-2012, 10:17 AM
shelby shelby is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 350
Default

lagg3 and me109e machine guns, mig flying in dogfight and some more....

Last edited by shelby; 07-01-2012 at 10:22 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-01-2012, 10:35 AM
SaQSoN SaQSoN is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Nowhereland
Posts: 340
Default

There are no mistakes with the things you listed. Unless you can clearly describe a mistake exactly what it is and provide documents (meaning, written/printed official test results, not propaganda movies), proving the mistake exists.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-02-2012, 12:17 AM
Treetop64's Avatar
Treetop64 Treetop64 is offline
What the heck...?
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Redwood City, California
Posts: 513
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by shelby View Post
lagg3 and me109e machine guns, mig flying in dogfight and some more....
"Vague" doesn't even begin to describe the above statement, which the author presents as evidence of "mistakes". Especially the "some more" part.

No one argues against critical analysis (which the above is certainly not), but make at least make a small effort at validating your case. Others would be more willing to listen and think about what you say, regardless of whether they agree or not.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-02-2012, 05:33 AM
shelby shelby is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 350
Default

Look i just put some documentaries about planes of ww2 so if they are based in reality then the planes in game need some work to be more realistic but i don't know if that can be done and i don't have official documents to argue
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-02-2012, 05:35 AM
CWMV's Avatar
CWMV CWMV is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 758
Default

What the Heck are you talking about?
What do you think is off?
Can you please state your case and remove your spam posts?
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by banned View Post
Just fix the friggin thing you boof heads. It's getting boring now. Only 11 people on the whole thing. Yawn.

Last edited by CWMV; 07-02-2012 at 05:39 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-02-2012, 10:40 AM
[URU]BlackFox [URU]BlackFox is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 125
Default

Documentarys can even say that the Spitfire won the BoB alone shelby. I wouldn't just present a case with a few TV programs. If we paid attention to that we would be flying the "Dogfights" series UFOs instead of realistic, believable planes that actually obey pshysics.

So unless you can provide official documents, or test results, as many others have done, I'm afraid you won't get much luck in being paid attention to.

There are still things to review, no doubt about it, but youtube documentarys don't help the process.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-02-2012, 02:06 PM
ECV56_Guevara ECV56_Guevara is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Planeta Trampa
Posts: 248
Default

Hey DT mail sent!
__________________

Bombing smurfs since a long time ago...
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 07-02-2012, 07:41 PM
Treetop64's Avatar
Treetop64 Treetop64 is offline
What the heck...?
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Redwood City, California
Posts: 513
Default

Don't get me started on "Dogfights". My mood turns foul just thinking about it. To think that many naively devour everything that show tosses them, ugh! It's not just the "pirouetting P-51" episode, either. There are egregious offenses over multiple episodes.

A prime example of gaining ratings at the expense of everything else.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 07-03-2012, 06:24 PM
Lagarto Lagarto is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 236
Default

A smashed-windscreen visual effect would be a nice addition. In real life hits against armor-glass windscreens (from rear gunners, debris or head-on passes) often resulted in smashed windscreens, nearly obliterated forward view but no actual penetration into the cockpit. However, in the game such hits are shown as simple bullet holes. Not very realistic IMHO.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 07-14-2012, 01:39 PM
Fenice_1965's Avatar
Fenice_1965 Fenice_1965 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Italy
Posts: 140
Default

An improvement of the views system can be' interesting. The possibility to exclude padlock only for planes. Ground targets are way more difficult to spot and some servers will appreciate the possibility to exclude padlock for planes and live it for tanks.
Bb
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:32 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.