![]() |
#91
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
All the above said... I have read, understood and assimilated your post Blackdog and I do see that DX9 users are not holding us back..... my above post is addressed to the DX9 users who seem to think it is excusable or acceptable for them to do so.
![]() |
#92
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
However releasing the patch in two steps would allow those 85% of the users with DX10+ support benefit from the improvements. I cannot see one slight inconvenient for the DX9 users if they have to wait a couple of weeks longer just because the others would not have to wait. |
#93
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It's not as simple as that. Anyone who's done some mildly advanced project management knows that sometimes branching off is a bad mistake. Especially if it's about core features.
If you look at the quality of bug reports you'll quickly understand why. Even oldtimers are sometimes just posting rubbish like "the game isn't faster for me". Wow, what great detail. I bet that really helped finding the cause. Personally I don't mind waiting a bit longer. It's a damn small game and I expect longer development cycles. Now that they try to post some updates I'm content with what they do. Based on the extremely low income they have from selling the game I guess we can't expect more anyways. That said - did any of you think of how they actually monetize the game so they can keep developing? Maybe DX9 support is very much needed for a different project. And yes, delaying or slacking on that front could mean going bankrupt. The few tiny sales to IL-2 freaks DO NOT keep this game alive. Last edited by Madfish; 06-17-2012 at 12:09 PM. |
#94
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
The fact that the team already released a Beta patch just for DX-10 users negates any suggestion that the two can't be released (in Beta form) separately. You're right that all the features will need to be tested together
__________________
Luthier: If not for your guys' criticism and incredibly high standards, we'd never have become what we are. Keep it up! Source for the sceptical: http://forum.1cpublishing.eu/showpos...11&postcount=9 |
#95
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Anyway, i was referring to the final patch when i said it's impossible to release it separately depending on DX version. As far as testing ones go, we got a DX10 patch already and now we'll be getting a DX9+DX10 one. From where i'm standing it doesn't seem like DX9 is gobbling up that much of their resources, especially if we take in account that the sim has been semi-playable on DX10 for months, but nearly unplayable on DX9 ever since release. Another thing to note is that most if not all of the effects in the sim are already coded in DX9. Ammunition impact flashes, hit decals, etc...that's the reason they were disabled in the recent test patch: they are DX9 and the patch was DX10 only. It's probably cheaper and faster to just optimize them than redo them for a different DX version from scratch. What i'm trying to say is, not many people think about these things and their ramifications. Complaints are justified in a lot of cases but many don't really take the time to actually see if what they are writing is true or even reasonable, or when they do they don't clearly separate truth, personal speculation and logical deduction, they usually just clump them up altogether in a package of arbitrary, personal truth and expect others to accept it. That makes it hard to convince others, because honestly the first thing that pops to my mind in such a case is "User X doesn't care enough to present his case, so why should i take it for granted without doubting it? Maybe he's just ranting or maybe he's got something, but i'm not convinced either way." I'm not referring to you by the way, you're generally a reasonable guy to debate with. I'm referring to the same kind of posts madfish (i think it was him?) describes a few posts up. Cheers ![]() |
#96
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
No, we got a DX10 BETA patch. Not a DX10 release patch ...
|
#97
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
IMHO: I, along with others, have asked the dev's to post their computer spec's. We were ignored. This leads me to believe, that their systems are
probably XP operated and DX9 based. Which, would explain some of the problems and speed in repairing them, not to mention the necessity, of having DX9 fully functional. This is just my opinion and I mean no harm or insult to anyone. |
#98
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
__________________
Intel core I7 950 @ 3.8 Asus PT6 Motherboard 6 gigs OCZ DDR3 1600 Asus GTX580 Direct CU II 60gigSSD with only Windows7 64bit, Hotas Peripherals, and COD running on it 500gig HD Dual Boot Samsung 32"LG 120hz MSFF2 Joystick Cougar Throttle Saitek Pro Rudder pedals Voice Activation Controls Track IR 5 ProClip Last edited by Chivas; 06-17-2012 at 05:26 PM. |
#99
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
![]() In regards to your last points, the problem with an internet forum is that the moment you take a line (in many cases people see it as black and white; fanboy against 'whiner') the average person's mentality will be to stick to their guns. You have a computer screen as protection and it's very easy to maintain a level of stubbornness within debate. That's what we see everyday on these forums: unreasonable debate from people that, in real life, would most likely understand your own point of view if you were to partake in direct conversation. The element of 'I'm right, you're wrong' underpins all of these topics, and really it is getting repetitive now. The ambiguity of the game's future and current standing doesn't help, either. Bottom line is that if the final patch isn't released within a few weeks, and any exciting news isn't published within a month, I can't see there being much interesting debate at all around here.
__________________
Luthier: If not for your guys' criticism and incredibly high standards, we'd never have become what we are. Keep it up! Source for the sceptical: http://forum.1cpublishing.eu/showpos...11&postcount=9 |
#100
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Another patch update and this came to mind:
![]()
__________________
|
![]() |
|
|