![]() |
|
IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games. |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
i can say when flying a simple piper warrior i tend to forget the prop is there till i see the outer edges.
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
if you're getting tearing (horizontal lines) then its your frame rate, and you need to turn graphics settings down till you're getting 30 or 60 or 120 fps with adaptive vertical sync on... if you have an nvidia card anyway.... the screen tearing is only a result of the video card drawing frames at a different speed than your monitor displays them...
as for how shiny the propeller is... has anyone here used a prop with the kind of paint the props had back in the 40s? maybe the paint is more reflective? I do find the props bright with the sun behind me, but i can still ignore the prop as if it wasn't there... you could try adjusting your monitors contrast and gamma a bit... and as for the prop being a disadvantage... if everyone has a shiny prop, then everyone has the same disadvantage, and its not a disadvantage anymore. if you make it an optional thing, then some will have a disadvantage while others don't. and if your gonna have a seizure, your just as likely to have one from diablo 3, or any other game with lots of bright shiny flashing things as you are from this bright shiny flashy thing... but they don't put epilepsy filters on TV commercials and music videos... if your predisposed to epilepsy you should be avoiding TV and games, stick to books and non-fast moving stuff. Last edited by AKA_Tenn; 05-23-2012 at 04:01 AM. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Can we please paint the props flat black? This new prop thingy is awful. Yes realistic but it's like you can alter your course a whole 20 degrees left/right and that sun against the prop still messes with your visibility. It's not that wide of an angle.
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Putting aside for a moment the like-dislike debate, in real life the prop is completely invisible for 95% of sunlight angles. For the remaining 5% of case, you can focus your sight beyond sun reflection, a thing you cannot do with the same effectiveness watching a comp screen. Then there are the health-comforts issues. Epilepsy must be a primary concern, but we also should be concerned with other undesirable effects, such as headache, vertigo and nausea. Conclusion: for the sake of realism, and for health-comfort reasons, I’m asking for a much, much more subtle effect. However, I’m aware that other people have different tastes, and an option can be a solution for all needs. But the order of priority should be reversed. Realism and health-concerns ask for a subtler effect as standard. Option should be there for people who prefer a less realistic and more visible prop effect. |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
other then some people wanting to see altered movie effects in the sim instead of a real representation of what a spinning prop looks like in real life, or the one poser with limited real life experience who suddenly believes himself to be the lone expert on this on earth, most experienced pilots of smaller prop aircraft would agree it should only be barely visible under most normal conditions. its not really an issue that is disputed. Quote:
the single main issue is that in 95% of cases the prop should simply not be visible on a pc ww2 aircraft simulator, and if it can be achieved that under certain light or weather conditions the prob in real life does become somewhat visible, this does NOT mean we should have that "effect" imposed on players 100% of the time under all visibility/light/weather conditions for the sake of the fake-real crowd who want to see a prop spin (even if in real life you couldnt see the prop at all).
__________________
President Dwight D. Eisenhower 1953: Every gun that is made, every warship launched, every rocket fired signifies, in the final sense, a theft from those who hunger and are not fed, those who are cold and are not clothed. This world in arms is not spending money alone, it is spending the sweat of its laborers, the genius of its scientists, the hopes of its children Last edited by zapatista; 05-25-2012 at 07:23 AM. |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Agree 100% zap.
Just another bogus "harder is more real" gamer misconception.
__________________
![]() Personally speaking, the P-40 could contend on an equal footing with all the types of Messerschmitts, almost to the end of 1943. ~Nikolay Gerasimovitch Golodnikov |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I went for a fly today and had a play around with trying to get some Sun reflection on the prop. Images below with Sun direct 6 O'Clock about 15degress elevation
![]() ![]() Prop is Matt Black on the rear surface. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
S!
What plane is that IvanK? Has the Russian Accelerometer so possibly a Yak? |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
What is that bird? A Yak 52? Cool!
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Indeed YAK52 Here it is image taken from another YAK52
![]() Last edited by IvanK; 05-28-2012 at 07:06 AM. |
![]() |
|
|