Inaccurate performance data for BOB fighters in COD comparing to RL data

[Kurfürst]

Originally Posted by JtD

If they were using 87 Octane in the BoB, a tiny bit of evidence should have turned up by now. Instead we have a lawyer doing the Chewbacca defence.

Actually we only have a handful of raffanatics doing the good old character assassination campaign, because they can't come up with anything better, mental or material, as they lack in both.

[JtD]

Originally Posted by Kurfürst

Actually we only have a handful of raffanatics doing the good old character assassination campaign, because they can't come up with anything better, mental or material, as they lack in both.

I asked you for what proof you have to support your claims, and you came up with nothing. Since then, you're only hanging around to throw out insults and red herrings, just look at the ten last posts you made here. Imo, no one is assassinating your character, your character committed suicide many, many pages ago. I guess some are desecrating the corpse, I wonder what made them this mad at you.

[Kurfürst]

Originally Posted by JtD

I asked you for what proof you have to support your claims, and you came up with nothing.

I kindly ask you to stop lying and re-read the thread from the beginning.

[bongodriver]

Amazing really, in discussions about the battle of Britain the Luftwhiners claim the US won it for the Brits because they sent us 100 octane and in the same breath deny we ever used it.........confused?

[Glider]

Originally Posted by Kurfürst

Actually we only have a handful of raffanatics doing the good old character assassination campaign, because they can't come up with anything better, mental or material, as they lack in both.

Well if you could come up with some supporting evidence for the theory that the the RAF used 87 octane in the BOB it would be welcome.